![](https://media.scored.co/preview/140InI0Hxf.png)
Oops. Their Covid narrative got peer reviewed in The Lancet (now officially printed on toilet paper to save time). "Why is this SO important? The 1905 SCOTUS case Jacobson v Mass. held that mandates can only be considered to “prevent the spread of contagious disease.” And now, OOPS, they DON'T
(media.greatawakening.win)
⚠️ Vax-tarded ☠️
![](https://media.greatawakening.win/post/PSyc47VC.jpeg)
Also, Jacobson v Massachusetts only referred to mandates at a state level. It makes no mention of federal mandates.