Oops. Their Covid narrative got peer reviewed in The Lancet (now officially printed on toilet paper to save time). "Why is this SO important? The 1905 SCOTUS case Jacobson v Mass. held that mandates can only be considered to “prevent the spread of contagious disease.” And now, OOPS, they DON'T
(media.greatawakening.win)
⚠️ Vax-tarded ☠️
Lancet study proves the shot does not prevent transmission.
“fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated”
“fully vaccinated people who got COVID infected others in their household at the same rate (about 25%) as unvaccinated people did (23%).
The vaccinated had just as much viral load in their upper respiratory tract, making them just as contagious.”
Why is this SO important?
The 1905 SCOTUS case Jacobson v Massachusetts held that mandates can only be considered to “prevent the spread of contagious disease.”
As all studies show the shots don’t stop transmission, Covid mandates are obviously illegal.
That's fantastic work!
The other reason that they are illegal is because there are non-experimental effective treatments available ie. ivermectin and HCQ. It's why these treatments have been suppressed so hard.
How do we hold them to account?
What about the FDA approved Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine is not even being available in this country. There is a legal difference in the two Pfizer shots.
What the hell is “Comirnaty” supposed to mean? Is it a comm?
Do you have a link to the full study?
https://www.thelancet.com/lancet/article/s1473309921006484
Thanks
👆I knew one of our heroes would be able to add it. Thanks patriot 👆
Bookmark thanks
yes please
https://www.thelancet.com/lancet/article/s1473309921006484
This.
Yep. And this has been known since day one as Pfizer said it never prevented infection or transmission, so 💯 illegal to mandate.
Also, Jacobson v Massachusetts only referred to mandates at a state level. It makes no mention of federal mandates.
Declared conflicts of interest include funding from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Hence this conclusion:
How can they seriously write that. Complete non sequitur.
Keeps the grants coming, though.