Oops. Their Covid narrative got peer reviewed in The Lancet (now officially printed on toilet paper to save time). "Why is this SO important? The 1905 SCOTUS case Jacobson v Mass. held that mandates can only be considered to “prevent the spread of contagious disease.” And now, OOPS, they DON'T
(media.greatawakening.win)
⚠️ Vax-tarded ☠️
Woe v Wade? Typo or is this an "I see what you did here"?
No typo. The essence of Woe v. Wade is "My body; my choice," which directly contradicts the ruling of Jacobson v Massachusetts, and has been the by-words of the left for 50 years, but not any longer for some reason.
Whatever our feelings on Woe, it does overturn Jacobson. Not for the right reasons, since there is another body involved, but it does say that one's body is theirs alone.