lol we def aren't watching the same thing. I'll guarantee that your IQ is under 100 and you're easily manipulated. After you hear the defense' closing argument I guarantee you'll be back here saying "no way he gets charged" your brain has water on it, please refrain from ever speaking publicly again. Thank you
Ahh yes, the insult. Attack the person when you can't attack the argument.
I am looking forward to the defense, and we will see, I'm still open minded. However, that doesn't change the facts.
Why was he pointing his gun around to "trigger" the pedo which caused the chase?
Also the initial threat wasn't on camera, when they testified they gave a time frame, but when they showed what was on camera, it didn't add up.
I never said he was guilty or anything, I just pointed out the fact that the state brought up some good points.
Now please, argue the facts, and try to be more open to debate, and not shut down opposing views with insults. You've engaged in a sort of censorship, and since you're here, I'll assume you're against that. You make this community look bad.
There is no evidence that he pointed his gun at all. The evidence the prosecution claims is relevant in a blurry digitally altered image from a drone in which Kyle is maybe two pixels high.
I believe it to be fact that your IQ is lower than 100 due to the fact that your emotions were swayed by a member of the tribe who pointed a rifle at the people in the court room with his finger on the trigger... (also didn't check to see if the gun was cleared) I bet you struggle with your pronouns don't ya? lol
I just did... you're defending a pedophile little boy rapist, a wife beater, and your fellow homosexual antifa geek who admitted to pointing his gun at Kyle... under oath. I win, you lose glowbohomo
lol we def aren't watching the same thing. I'll guarantee that your IQ is under 100 and you're easily manipulated. After you hear the defense' closing argument I guarantee you'll be back here saying "no way he gets charged" your brain has water on it, please refrain from ever speaking publicly again. Thank you
Ahh yes, the insult. Attack the person when you can't attack the argument.
I am looking forward to the defense, and we will see, I'm still open minded. However, that doesn't change the facts.
Why was he pointing his gun around to "trigger" the pedo which caused the chase?
Also the initial threat wasn't on camera, when they testified they gave a time frame, but when they showed what was on camera, it didn't add up.
I never said he was guilty or anything, I just pointed out the fact that the state brought up some good points.
Now please, argue the facts, and try to be more open to debate, and not shut down opposing views with insults. You've engaged in a sort of censorship, and since you're here, I'll assume you're against that. You make this community look bad.
Glow on glow fag
Aren't glow fags a little more provocative?
I'm just pointing out facts, not trying to start a riot.
I suppose we will see what the verdict is to see if I'm just an ass hat, or I was right to assume the jury won't see it the same way as you guys.
There is no evidence that he pointed his gun at all. The evidence the prosecution claims is relevant in a blurry digitally altered image from a drone in which Kyle is maybe two pixels high.
I believe it to be fact that your IQ is lower than 100 due to the fact that your emotions were swayed by a member of the tribe who pointed a rifle at the people in the court room with his finger on the trigger... (also didn't check to see if the gun was cleared) I bet you struggle with your pronouns don't ya? lol
Debate the facts please
I just did... you're defending a pedophile little boy rapist, a wife beater, and your fellow homosexual antifa geek who admitted to pointing his gun at Kyle... under oath. I win, you lose glowbohomo