The CDC has 30+ illnesses listed, and if a person has one of those illnesses and ALSO "tests positive" for HIV, then they are diagnosed with AIDS. If they have the illness but "test negative" for HIV then they have the illness, but not AIDS.
The HIV test is PCR. They have some others they use now, too, but all are bogus tests.
There has NEVER been any proof that HIV causes AIDS. (HIV itself probably doesn't exist, either; but that is yet another topic.)
AIDS in NOT an illness that a person can "get." It is ONLY a definition, based on a bogus HIV test, plus a real sickness.
In the 1970's, gay men in San Francisco were getting weird illnesses that doctors could not explain. Fauci and his co-conspirators called it "Gay-Related Immune Deficiency (GRID)," but he couldn't get funding when people thought it only affected gay men.
So, he changed the name to "Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrom (AIDS)" and the money rolled in, because people were falsely told that anybody could get it. There was never any evidence that the illnesses had to do with AIDS or HIV. There were only unsubstantiated claims (no real science behind it at all -- sound familiar?).
Eventually, others figured out that gay men were taking very toxic drugs, called amyl nitrate ("poppers") to have gay sex, and also staying up for days at a time and using toxic recreational drugs to do it. That was what was destroying their immune system.
Fauci gave these people AZT, a failed chemo drug. But instead of giving them a specific number of doses and then stopping, the patients were given it forever, and they died from the AZT overdose.
People in Africa get diseases of poverty, and they get sick. This is falsely labeled AIDS because the PCR tests are bogus (sound familiar?). But the African dictators get lots of foreign money they can steal, so why not go with the con?
That is AIDS in a nutshell. It is not a real thing.
Hijack: AIDS does NOT EXIST.
AIDS is a definition, not an illness.
The CDC has 30+ illnesses listed, and if a person has one of those illnesses and ALSO "tests positive" for HIV, then they are diagnosed with AIDS. If they have the illness but "test negative" for HIV then they have the illness, but not AIDS.
The HIV test is PCR. They have some others they use now, too, but all are bogus tests.
There has NEVER been any proof that HIV causes AIDS. (HIV itself probably doesn't exist, either; but that is yet another topic.)
AIDS in NOT an illness that a person can "get." It is ONLY a definition, based on a bogus HIV test, plus a real sickness.
In the 1970's, gay men in San Francisco were getting weird illnesses that doctors could not explain. Fauci and his co-conspirators called it "Gay-Related Immune Deficiency (GRID)," but he couldn't get funding when people thought it only affected gay men.
So, he changed the name to "Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrom (AIDS)" and the money rolled in, because people were falsely told that anybody could get it. There was never any evidence that the illnesses had to do with AIDS or HIV. There were only unsubstantiated claims (no real science behind it at all -- sound familiar?).
Eventually, others figured out that gay men were taking very toxic drugs, called amyl nitrate ("poppers") to have gay sex, and also staying up for days at a time and using toxic recreational drugs to do it. That was what was destroying their immune system.
Fauci gave these people AZT, a failed chemo drug. But instead of giving them a specific number of doses and then stopping, the patients were given it forever, and they died from the AZT overdose.
People in Africa get diseases of poverty, and they get sick. This is falsely labeled AIDS because the PCR tests are bogus (sound familiar?). But the African dictators get lots of foreign money they can steal, so why not go with the con?
That is AIDS in a nutshell. It is not a real thing.
House of Numbers Documentary:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k7168G95ecNT/
Lol the fact that that documentary is still on YouTube proves it’s BS.
Been taken down and reuploaded many times over several years.
I assume you are unable to debate the substance of the topic, and that's why you tried to deflect.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?app=desktop&list=PL24OWVi6trL21EJN8nnOl-c3928nL9IXI
If you can't put it into your own words, it means you don't really understand the subject enough to debate it.
Yawn.
^ Spotted the non-thinker.
I don't know why they didn't go with the bleeding (kek) obvious acronym ASS
Alfred
Shitcock
Syndrome
That is all
👋🐸
V
V
V
🎤
🕳🐇