Just a reminder that Posobiec once interviewed the founder of "q-anon" and tried to discredit the whole movement, so his bullshit should be a little suspicious at all times because he's controlled.
His role in this whole situation is to agitate conservatives and make them as angry as possible - most of his posts turn out to be BS.
I prefer for the content of what is being presented be disproved with alternate facts on the subject. I choose to discern for myself the truth of a statement without polluting with bias about who said it. Discernment.
So, if Hillary said that same thing you'd give it a fair shake and pay attention instead of dismissing it outright because the person saying it is poisoned?
My tendency nowadays is to already know whether HRC statement contains TRUTH or lies based upon the research I have already done. I would be able to clearly articulate what might be motivating the comment, which would be far more useful information, imho.
Just a reminder that Posobiec once interviewed the founder of "q-anon" and tried to discredit the whole movement, so his bullshit should be a little suspicious at all times because he's controlled.
His role in this whole situation is to agitate conservatives and make them as angry as possible - most of his posts turn out to be BS.
I prefer for the content of what is being presented be disproved with alternate facts on the subject. I choose to discern for myself the truth of a statement without polluting with bias about who said it. Discernment.
So, if Hillary said that same thing you'd give it a fair shake and pay attention instead of dismissing it outright because the person saying it is poisoned?
My tendency nowadays is to already know whether HRC statement contains TRUTH or lies based upon the research I have already done. I would be able to clearly articulate what might be motivating the comment, which would be far more useful information, imho.
So then you would take heavily into account who is speaking ... interesting.