[Tulsi Gabbard] The jury got it right—finding Rittenhouse not guilty on all charges. The fact that charges were brought before any serious investigation is evidence that the government was motivated by politics, which itself should be considered criminal - The Great Awakening

695

[Tulsi Gabbard] The jury got it right—finding Rittenhouse not guilty on all charges. The fact that charges were brought before any serious investigation is evidence that the government was motivated by politics, which itself should be considered criminal (twitter.com)

posted 3 years ago by Tefren 3 years ago by Tefren +698 / -3

81 comments

81 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (81)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– patriotic_legend 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

?????

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– patriotic_legend 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I disagree, there will still be a right and a left, however, the spectrum as a whole will shift to the right. You think after all this everyone will agree on everything? There will still be disagreement. There will always be a right and a left that is human nature. but this time there will be a true division of political parties, unlike the uniparty we have today.

I didn't understand why you stated that "I like to repeat history", I stated my opinion on Tulsi's future, not that I support her.

Who knows maybe she isn't a satanic pedo and she will not be in the tribunals. There will be some on the left that survive this.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q