Hmm. It's a compilation of all the evil things people said about Kyle but my impression, trying to be a naive reader, is that everyone is against Kyle, lots of people I've heard about condemn him, there is no refutation or counterpoint at all defending Kyle. Given this and knowing nothing else, I'd conclude Kyle is a bad person and all the protesters are noble idealists.
Presume from the start that the media knows all the linguistic and emoting and lighting tricks that every good propagandist knows. You have to overcome them. Just repeating them re-triggers whatever it was that hooked the person you are trying to unhook. Their message has to be derailed. For instance, you could approach from the angle of defining things, like "white (perjorative)" and how you know it if you see it. This is undermining the rationale for hating, without the complication of personalities.
This is still a valuable collection. These are the ideas that have to be refuted, put into context, shown to be lies, shown to be contradictory, shown to be inconsistent with videos and testimony, etc.
archive website pls
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1461774470113280009.html
Here is all tweets together
Hmm. It's a compilation of all the evil things people said about Kyle but my impression, trying to be a naive reader, is that everyone is against Kyle, lots of people I've heard about condemn him, there is no refutation or counterpoint at all defending Kyle. Given this and knowing nothing else, I'd conclude Kyle is a bad person and all the protesters are noble idealists.
Presume from the start that the media knows all the linguistic and emoting and lighting tricks that every good propagandist knows. You have to overcome them. Just repeating them re-triggers whatever it was that hooked the person you are trying to unhook. Their message has to be derailed. For instance, you could approach from the angle of defining things, like "white (perjorative)" and how you know it if you see it. This is undermining the rationale for hating, without the complication of personalities.
This is still a valuable collection. These are the ideas that have to be refuted, put into context, shown to be lies, shown to be contradictory, shown to be inconsistent with videos and testimony, etc.