So, if the definition of "jabbed" (rightly) included those jabbed within 21 days, it's possible (but not verifiable with the data given) that 1) death rates among the jabbed are higher and 2) death rates among the unjabbed are lower than the data they provided shows.
(Given the many reports of deaths immedtely after, and with the first few weeks after the jab, the 14 and 21 day shenanigans could seem to be blatant attempts to (no pun intended) bury (/hide) the deadliness/toxicity of the jabs.)
So, if the definition of "jabbed" (rightly) included those jabbed within 21 days, it's possible (but not verifiable with the data given) that 1) death rates among the jabbed are higher and 2) death rates among the unjabbed are lower than the data they provided shows.
(Given the many reports of deaths immedtely after, and with the first few weeks after the jab, the 14 and 21 day shenanigans could seem to be blatant attempts to (no pun intended) bury (/hide) the deadliness/toxicity of the jabs.)