What is being pointed out is that using a photograph as evidence to support Kamala is involved with Harris opens the door for other similar photographs to be used as evidence for others.
Trump is in photos with Maxwell, and is on the flight logs. Why ignore this, but use this photo to support the notion that Harris is involved? It’s logically inconsistent
What is being pointed out is that using a photograph as evidence to support Kamala is involved with Harris opens the door for other similar photographs to be used as evidence for others.
Trump is in photos with Maxwell, and is on the flight logs. Why ignore this, but use this photo to support the notion that Harris is involved? It’s logically inconsistent