Video of Analysis of "Patterns of Deployment of Toxic Covid Batches" (Toxic Batches Appear to be Systematically Released)
(www.bitchute.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Thought experiment for critical thinkers:
Pick a 'standard batch size' - for example, 10,000 doses per batch.
If the batches are that size or smaller, then the 'most toxic' batches would show one adverse reaction for every two or three patients. I have a hard time believing that would go unnoticed by even the most jaded doctor or nurse.
If the batches are that size or larger, then we quickly exceed the total number of doses produced ('avg batch size' times 'number of batches').
I think it's impossible that each batch is the same size.
Again, this is just a thought experiment -- I don't have real numbers to compare it to.
Thanks for being one of the few in this thread who is a critical thinker, and has some understanding regarding garbage statistics.
Batch size is one of the problems. Even for identical batch sizes, they aren't necessarily all injected. Large amounts of a batch might have been thrown away for a variety of reasons, like damage during shipment, or sitting on a shelf too long and expiring.
There's a ton of other issues aside from size, see my other posts in this thread for more.
The 'batch number' data entry is terrible.
I estimate that there are (roughly) 300 true batch numbers, but there are more than 40,000 additional 'botched' batch numbers (extraneous letters, '4' instead of 'A', extra spaces or periods, starts with '#', etc.).
Almost all of those botched batch numbers have only one entry (for obvious reasons), but a few have more than 100, such as 'batch number' "EUA", "PFIZER", "N/A", etc.
The analysis in the video is useless (as he clearly thinks there are far more than 300 actual batch numbers).
That is also a good point, and shows yet another problem with all this junk analysis of the VAERS data.
It's not just a 'problem', it completely invalidates the very premise of the analysis (that there are a lot of 'safe' batches).
'Worst pandemic in the world', and no one verifies (or fixes) the data. /smdh
On a side note, there is a database of Vax lot numbers - but the CDC won't release that info publicly. It is 'registered users' only, and private individuals will be denied access.
https://vaccinecodeset.cdc.gov/LotNumber/