I don't understand, does the graphic in the article say that for every 100 000 vaccinated people, we have around 3 deaths, and for every 100 000 unvaccinated people, we have around 1.5 deaths?
Because if that is the correct interpretation, then it means nothing and this article is just trolling people who share without checking.
This is not statistically significant.
It's like those mainstream media fake news articles where they say deaths increased by 50% but the actual death toll just jumped from 1 to 2.
I don't understand, does the graphic in the article say that for every 100 000 vaccinated people, we have around 3 deaths, and for every 100 000 unvaccinated people, we have around 1.5 deaths?
Because if that is the correct interpretation, then it means nothing and this article is just trolling people who share without checking.
Consider this:
Vaccinated rate: 3 / 100 000 = 0.00003 (0.003%)
Unvaccinated rate: 1.5 / 100 000 = 0.000015 (0.0015%)
This is not statistically significant. It's like those mainstream media fake news articles where they say deaths increased by 50% but the actual death toll just jumped from 1 to 2.
I don't doubt that vaccinated people are dying at higher rates, but 10-59 is a huge age range; it's not a very useful data set.
10 year olds are much less likely to get vaccinated in general, and 59 year olds are much more likely to die in general.