They want you to focus on Kyle Rittenhouse and what happened in Waukesha, because both stem on racism. They need you to pick a side and pick eachother apart like roosters in a hen house, while the farmer grinds his blade for you and your children's necks.
The CDC approved the dangerous COVID vaccines for over 50 million children ages 5-11 to get mandatory vaccines. Which will fully destroy their natural immune systems to only fight one specific virus and NOTHING ELSE. Not to mention injury complications and death.
We should be sharpening our blades against the kings in the ivory castle, and not against each other. This is the most important time in American history, and we're butting heads over.... race and ethnicity? Grow up. Grow up for your kids, they're looking at you for protection and all you can do is chug beer and complain about Kyle Rittenhouse and or a Black Man running people over in his truck.
This is all sophisticated manipulation, and if you don't prepare now, you're going to lose.
My point is that you're effectively playing the "sleeping normie" "muh conspiracy theory" card of "you think this thing I disagree with? You must also be a big dumb anti-vaxxer flat Earth moron!!!!"
Also, there's an infinitely higher chance that Kyle is a false flag setup than there is of the Earth being flat. If either of you need to be put in the looney bin it would be you. Though in my view neither of you do.
Or just downvote me and not justify your stance. That's cool too....douche
I'll admit while I usually try not to downvote and reply (rather pick one or the other), I did downvote your first comment pulling the "conspiracy theorist" card. I didn't downvote your second reply or any of the others, however.
Lol its okay you can downvote whatever you want. It's quite silly to get so worked up over such trivial matters.
Nah is a classic example of baseless allegations with no evidence provided to support it.
And although it's probably more likely that Kyle is an actor and the whole Kenosha killing was a false flag than flat earth being real, there's no say to quantity the likelihood of each and thus no way to assign a figure to the greater percentage likelihood of one over the other.
Sounds like you think Kyle is an actor and he never killed anyone though. Maybe try sharing your rationale as to why?
The difference between you and me is I didn't pull the conspiracy theorist card when I disagreed with people claiming that Kyle is fake (nice assumption on what I think of Kyle though (based on literally nothing I might add)).
And the likelihood for the flat Earth is 0, similar to the likelihood of the vaccine being safe and effective being 0. They've both been confirmed to be false time and time again. People always like to bring up the "there should be a discussion instead of shutting it down" argument. The problem is that the discussion has already been had. Flat Earth lost. Many times. Rehashing the discussion will never change that.
That's in contrast to Kyle being a fake, false flag, actor, whatever which is somewhat possible however unlikely.
So effectively one has a possibility of being true while the other doesn't. Possible vs impossible. Hence, "infinitely higher chance".
Lol I see what you're saying. All I was saying though is that it's impossible to quantify a relative proportionality of the likelihoods of each. The only way one could assign the likelihood of flat earth being a thing as 0%, is if we operate on the assumption that either a) you're omnipotent, or B) You've physically ventured out into space to verify the claim for yourself.
But this has digressed into a pointless silly argument at this point since I've already made it clear that I've not yet come across a working model for flat earth that adequately explains seasons in tandem with lunar cycles and thus I cannot advocate the flat earth theory as being legitimate.
In short, you don't need to convince me flat earth isn't a thing since I'm already unconvinced.
Fair enough, however you do seem to be convinced that the only two ways to place its likelihood at 0% are to go to space or be Omnipotent. I disagree with this as well. There's plenty of experiments you can do on Earth that prove the Earth is round and couldn't be flat.
Regardless though, I have been wondering what the flat Earth explanation is for the sun setting in different places. One thing I've noticed recently when watching the sun go down is that, as opposed to several months ago where it sets straight down the road, the sun now sets off to the side somewhat. I'm not looking to be convinced (and while I understand that you aren't convinced yourself I figured I'd ask in case you'd come across an explanation for this since you seem to have done more research than I have) but I suppose simply through a desire to understand the opposing argument I was wondering if there's any explanation for that, or if that may be another thing that you haven't really found an explanation for?