Lin Wood has some Questions Concerning the Tucker Carlson Interview with Kyle Rittenhouse - The Great Awakening

289

Lin Wood has some Questions Concerning the Tucker Carlson Interview with Kyle Rittenhouse 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔

posted 3 years ago by Mukzn 3 years ago by Mukzn +291 / -2

Questions raised by the Deep State Fox interview of Kyle Rittenhouse by Tucker Carlson:

When was the interview arranged?
Who arranged the interview?
When was the interview conducted? Kyle’s verdict was rendered around Noon on Friday. With clips of the interview shown, Fox and Tucker were promoting the interview on Friday evening. That sure was a fast turn around!!!
How did Kyle go in a few short hours from being the emotional young man exonerated on murder charges to appearing to be a composed, scripted young man in the Tucker Carlson interview?
After this national and personal ordeal, why did Tucker focus on me??? Weren’t there more important issues to discuss publicly?
I was NEVER contacted by Fox or Tucker Carlson to be informed of the accusations and afforded an opportunity to respond. Why not??? Tucker Carlson (and Sean Hannity) have my cell number. I was one call away. This was clearly a Fox ambush hit piece on me. Who wanted to use Kyle Rittenhouse to falsely attack me?
Why did Fox totally ignore the background of David Hancock (a/k/a Fraudcock), the disgraced former Navy SEAL, in discussing Kyle? I spoke to Kyle one time briefly over a year ago. Fraudcock has been in total control of Kyle and his mother for almost one year. The public record raises very serious questions about the honesty and agenda of Fraudcock.
Why did Tucker strongly suggest that I was one of Kyle’s criminal lawyers? I was not. John Pierce was calling the shots for Kyle during the time period in question along with Mark Richards. I was not. I was just trying to help Kyle through #FightBack. I had agreed to help him in defamation matters after the criminal case. Why did John Pierce terminate that relationship almost immediately after #FightBack posted the bail monies.

There are MANY more serious questions to be explored with respect to this Deep State ambush hit piece.

Do the research. Connect the dots. Draw your own conclusions.

Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸

Link to Original Telegram Post: https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7484

95 comments

95 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (95)

sorted by:

▲ 15 ▼

– blacksmith21 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

These are all valid questions with valid responses. I've always been a supporter of Tucker, but I this interview raised some questions in my head as well. From a production standpoint, how did they turn around the finished piece so fast? Kyle's adult demeanor, composure and responses far outpace his 18 years. Sure, I've met plenty of smart and composed 18 year olds, but there was something a bit too polished about his delivery.

I do agree with other comments here - let's see how this plays out. The fact that none of us knew Wood was supposedly his attorney - at least as portrayed in the interview - is a bit of a surprise.