289
posted ago by Mukzn ago by Mukzn +291 / -2

Questions raised by the Deep State Fox interview of Kyle Rittenhouse by Tucker Carlson:

  1. When was the interview arranged?

  2. Who arranged the interview?

  3. When was the interview conducted? Kyle’s verdict was rendered around Noon on Friday. With clips of the interview shown, Fox and Tucker were promoting the interview on Friday evening. That sure was a fast turn around!!!

  4. How did Kyle go in a few short hours from being the emotional young man exonerated on murder charges to appearing to be a composed, scripted young man in the Tucker Carlson interview?

  5. After this national and personal ordeal, why did Tucker focus on me??? Weren’t there more important issues to discuss publicly?

  6. I was NEVER contacted by Fox or Tucker Carlson to be informed of the accusations and afforded an opportunity to respond. Why not??? Tucker Carlson (and Sean Hannity) have my cell number. I was one call away. This was clearly a Fox ambush hit piece on me. Who wanted to use Kyle Rittenhouse to falsely attack me?

  7. Why did Fox totally ignore the background of David Hancock (a/k/a Fraudcock), the disgraced former Navy SEAL, in discussing Kyle? I spoke to Kyle one time briefly over a year ago. Fraudcock has been in total control of Kyle and his mother for almost one year. The public record raises very serious questions about the honesty and agenda of Fraudcock.

  8. Why did Tucker strongly suggest that I was one of Kyle’s criminal lawyers? I was not. John Pierce was calling the shots for Kyle during the time period in question along with Mark Richards. I was not. I was just trying to help Kyle through #FightBack. I had agreed to help him in defamation matters after the criminal case. Why did John Pierce terminate that relationship almost immediately after #FightBack posted the bail monies.

There are MANY more serious questions to be explored with respect to this Deep State ambush hit piece.

Do the research. Connect the dots. Draw your own conclusions.

Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸

Link to Original Telegram Post: https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7484

Comments (95)
sorted by:
54
escapefromearth 54 points ago +55 / -1
  1. Before the verdict
  2. I'm betting it was David Hancock
  3. Exactly
  4. I've been wondering the same thing myself. That was the most artificial interview I've ever seen.
  5. Because tucker and hancock can't be trusted
  6. David Hancock and his associates
  7. Now he's just handing you the answers
  8. To take control of the narrative.
52
TheSilentWalls 52 points ago +52 / -0

The number of people who take Tucker's word as gospel is frankly astounding.

24
escapefromearth 24 points ago +24 / -0

It's amazing that all someone has to do to gain the trust of others is to say something they want to hear. I trust no one.

11
badorangeman 11 points ago +16 / -5

It's amazing that all someone has to do to gain the trust of others is to say something they want to hear. I trust no one.

This is so Ironic considering we're talking about a Lin Wood post.

6
escapefromearth 6 points ago +6 / -0

It doens't matter who we are talking about, I feel that way about everyone. It's engraned in my personality. I trust no one.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
Wormself 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m tired of the blowing smoke part of the plan. I’ll start paying attention to him again when something he says about election fraud pans out.

3
Panzershrekt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why stop there? This could easily apply to Q as well.

1
Anandamide 1 point ago +1 / -0

One is doing it from FOX and getting paid.

One is sacrificing his entire life and reputation for what's right.

17
Lopeover 17 points ago +17 / -0

I question the loyalty to the Republic of everyone who remained at FOX after November 3, 2020.

6
MAGA124 6 points ago +6 / -0

This!

11
ProphetOfKek 11 points ago +11 / -0

I trust almost no one tbh, but Tucker certainly not.

10
callmedesdinova 10 points ago +13 / -3

The number of people who lend credence to Lin Wood is equally astounding.

17
test_pattern 17 points ago +17 / -0

it's not blind trust but a consideration of context. Wood is unmoved in his fight for 2020. Tucker is a limited hangout; when the election fraud is fixed, Tucker will be at the front of the pack explaining how they couldn't know, just learned, the facts are just coming out -- just like he did with General Flynn. consider the context and what each is risking/has to lose.

11
HelloDolly 11 points ago +11 / -0

The creepiest thing I ever saw Tucker Carlson do is shut down completely someone that asked him about 9/11. With the classic ad hominem "you're just crazy" response. Right after he said he will investigate any conspiracy and vet it no matter how far out it sounds. If I can find the clip after work I will come back and provide a link. Someone here I think posted it.

4
AlFreeman 4 points ago +6 / -2

He shut down all Hunter Biden discussion and defended him. But it ain't Tucker we are being asked to trust. It's Kyle vs. Lin. I can't imagine Kyle accusing Lin on national television without cause. And none of Lin's list of questions address the infraction he is accused of. It's all a conspiracy with him at the center. The man has a messiah complex. He even speaks like preacher at this point.

3
KSUIE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lin addressed the accusation on his telegram account. He provided the receipts for the bail FightBack paid. He was not Kyle’s criminal lawyer and his foundation paid the bail. Everything Kyle said about Lin was a lie. Lin doesn’t accuse Kyle of lying he believes he has been manipulated by Hancock.

-1
Forthelead -1 points ago +1 / -2

Lin contradicted PDT's instructions for the Georgia senate run-off vote.

That alone is problematic. He seems to have conflicts following him constantly - most often seemingly about money.

13
noidolsleft 13 points ago +13 / -0

Why did Trump leave an encouraging note for Lin on his doorstep this past June?

Going with the flow and no conflict has gotten us to this point. Other people are trying to make it about money, but Lin has meticulous records to show he is in the right.

1
test_pattern 1 point ago +1 / -0

you mean when Lin said don't vote and Trump said you must vote?

9
AReckoningIsComing 9 points ago +9 / -0

he's been steadfast in banging on about 2020 fix AND always shown receipts of his work and funding

1
CQVFEFE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because he is an unabashed Q student

5
Kunkussion 5 points ago +5 / -0

Seeing that he still has CNN in his blood, its like forgiving an arsonist for becoming a firefighter.. a lousy one at that.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
34
damessinger 34 points ago +35 / -1

I read that Tucker started his "documentary" when the trial started. Kyle's lawyer commented on having to kick the camera crew out of meetings. So I think Tucker planned on being the first one out the door with an interview with Kyle as soon as the verdict was read.

I don't know about the rest of this but I don't think it is enough "evidence" to turn on Lin Wood at this point.

6
ProphetOfKek 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not to mention, you can plan for an interview after the verdict and not be entirely sure of the verdict.

1
TheSilentWalls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is Lin also currently suing Rittenhouse's lawyer?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
26
Pbman 26 points ago +30 / -4

I don't think Kyle has been told the truth,by his handlers.

I'll stand with Lin on this one.

Fox News is deep state,controlled oposition.

7
Kunkussion 7 points ago +7 / -0

Me too. Though i don't stand strong with Lin, ill never stand with CNN blooded Carlson.

3
Forthelead 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled.

Know what I mean?

-4
RugerP89 -4 points ago +1 / -5

What has Lin done? Won a case for a conservative that vaulted him into fame and therefore $$$? Enmeshed himself in a community of paytriots?

He got called out by Kyle, and is now in self preservation mode for his credibility.

4
Lopeover 4 points ago +4 / -0

Rittenhouse & the grifters controlling him falsely accuse Lin Wood.

These dickheads attacking Lin think that #Fightback runs like a damn GoFundMe account. They also do not understand how the bail system works there. Kyle should be FN appreciative that he was able to get out of jail while waiting for his trial thanks to #Fightback putting up his bail.

If your family, friend or business partner pays your bail and the money is subsequently refunded; should the person or the third payor get the money back?

0
RugerP89 0 points ago +2 / -2

Lin Wood is your Alpha Male, gotcha.

4
Encognegro98ckun2qb 4 points ago +4 / -0

Some of us respect him and aren’t going to turn reflexively until we know more

24
b472113 24 points ago +29 / -5

What the f*** is all this b******* about Wood? Why don't you all just sit back and see how this plays out. You all sound like a bunch of old ladies that just hurd a rumor.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Gnometard 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love how the arguments here are about doing nothing or doing nothing.

Can't someone else do it?

16
Iceman80 16 points ago +25 / -9

Lin Woods televangelist schtick got old with me over a year ago. Let this play out.

7
BillWhittle24 7 points ago +9 / -2

The first thing I ever noticed about him was how he sounded just like a televangelist.

Not just the dialect, but the word choices and speech patterns.

11
Factfiler 11 points ago +11 / -0

That's the show attorney coming out. My attorney friends go into this mode when performing in court.

1
Forthelead 1 point ago +3 / -2

The "you can trust me, I'm a Christian" routine?

Those are the ones that you should never trust!

2
sackofwisdom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fundamentalist with a hard on for Jesus and the end times. It doesn’t seem like a healthy outlook to me.

15
blacksmith21 15 points ago +15 / -0

These are all valid questions with valid responses. I've always been a supporter of Tucker, but I this interview raised some questions in my head as well. From a production standpoint, how did they turn around the finished piece so fast? Kyle's adult demeanor, composure and responses far outpace his 18 years. Sure, I've met plenty of smart and composed 18 year olds, but there was something a bit too polished about his delivery.

I do agree with other comments here - let's see how this plays out. The fact that none of us knew Wood was supposedly his attorney - at least as portrayed in the interview - is a bit of a surprise.

7
Q20191776 7 points ago +7 / -0

That plus this story has had a heckuva lot of buzz from the very start with Kyle's "presence of mind". I still think God had a hand in this and still does. The truth that is to be revealed will come out.

5
GirlGoat144 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's had to recount all of this exactly many times since August. It seems quite scripted, but also importantly recounts details that I'm sure loads of people have no awareness of.

The jury's out on Tucker. Why he's "allowed" to cover what he does in the way he does it on a ds controlled network is up for speculation. It would truly be great, indeed, if the folks we saw doing good work were actually ALL good. There always seems to be a poison pill somewhere.

It seems that Tucker is being predatory towards Kyle, using him towards his own personal ends. Kyle's lawyers didn't say not to do it, apparently.

3
BigDon2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

I knew that he was. I’ve been following Lin Wood for over a year.

1
sackofwisdom 1 point ago +2 / -1

adult demeanor

The way he called Biden “Mr. President” and answered the sue-ing question with “my lawyers are handling it” tells me he is smart and was given good counsel.

He almost got many years in prison. He’s had to be on his best behavior so as not to get fucked hard in the ass.

12
Heldiggrisen 12 points ago +13 / -1

Remember what Steve Bannon said.

Focus on the signal

Lin Wood is all noise and static

-2
GoingCamaro -2 points ago +3 / -5

Kyle is too.

4
Heldiggrisen 4 points ago +6 / -2

Pretty sure Kyle is part of the plan.

Kyle sues MSM into oblivion.

Trumps DWAC comes in and buys up the burning rubble.

Trump rebrands MSM to patriotic thrustworthy companies.

4
CQVFEFE 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump rebrands MSM to patriotic thrustworthy companies

They're thrustworthy right now because fuck them :)

2
Heldiggrisen 2 points ago +2 / -0

😂sorry, English is not my first language (probably Arabic on a few years)

1
CQVFEFE 1 point ago +1 / -0

But you laughed which was the main thing :)

2
america1stnurse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now wouldn't that be some shit? I hope that's the case. Really interested to see how this plays out in the end.

10
Honeebadger 10 points ago +10 / -0

Stressful not knowing what to trust. Questions I have- was it a little weird judge was looking at cookie recipes while on break? Was it weird judge’s phone went off during trial and his song choice? Was it strange Kyle got thisclose to judge while looking over his shoulder at video? Someone posted the other day about the trial had possible green screen because a foot disappeared in courtroom? Then the parade event happening right after and now they going silent on the issue? What’s real? What’s fake? And under who’s control? Ahhhhh!!!!!!!

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
AReckoningIsComing 7 points ago +7 / -0

my alarm bells began ringing when Kyle did the Masonic hand signal (half covered in his jacket) and then when the whole greenscreen glitch thing went viral on twitter (foot through the floor) really weird

7
Young_Patriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is Wood implying this is a show?

6
More4me2 6 points ago +6 / -0

For what it’s worth, Robert Barnes said Rittenhouse was mistaken regarding Lin Wood

5
WeekoWolf 5 points ago +5 / -0

Finally a plot twist! Making more popcorn for the next scene.

5
TastyRamen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yikes now his attorney filed a case to get the 2 mill from Lin..... https://twitter.com/StacyStClair/status/1462849534518824964?s=20

6
Kunkussion 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lin never said he gave him any money though. This is poisoning the well. He just helped him promote #fightback. You are welcome to prove me wrong but this is the huge point people are missing. He never requested any money back either.. Even the tweet has no language whatsoever to conclude that's what Lin is doing. Its a fucking gaslight.

6
TastyRamen 6 points ago +6 / -0

Im with Lin just pointing this out just in case ppl dont know.

3
Kunkussion 3 points ago +3 / -0

Appreciate it, just responding to the rhetoric of the tweet

4
rayw_wwg1wga 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's also been going after General Flynn and Sidney Powell for whatever reason...

3
AReckoningIsComing 3 points ago +4 / -1

All the Patriots are turning on each other. Nobody knows who to trust!! Maybe its all a plan to make DS believe white hats are fractured and bolster their confidence??

1
RugerP89 1 point ago +2 / -1

Good thing I'm too lazy to 'follow' new Patriots, sticking with the same crowd since 2017.

1
Encognegro98ckun2qb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same

0
america1stnurse 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is what I don't get.

2
muhqtardtho 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tucker is a limited hangout.

2
Forthelead 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's not to get?

If it hisses like a snake and slithers like a snake, it's a snake!

3
simon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it possible that Kyle Rittenhouse is just another psy-op? Maybe the boy was never at risk of being convicted at all, and is part of the show.

3
therobots 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tuck Fucker!

3
TastyRamen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great points!

3
cbramwel 3 points ago +3 / -0

Be careful who you follow. This time I think you need to be very careful.

2
1sketchyv 2 points ago +2 / -0

People still watch Tucker?

2
Double_D 2 points ago +3 / -1

He’s asking a lot of questions for someone who should be answering some himself

2
Camden105b 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was all old news. The issues with Lin Wood and Kyle have been around for a long time. We all have to beware of some of these folks—not necessarily antagonist, but just be on guard. Listen to both sides and eventually the truth comes out.

2
ThatOtherOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe this is all part of the ongoing movie ......

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +2 / -1

Decided not to care one way or the other.

1
LeeChild 1 point ago +5 / -4

Screw Cucker and limp wood. They mean nothing in the grand scale.

1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm...interesting.

1
samlopes900se 1 point ago +1 / -0

Check this from AndWeKnow https://www.bitchute.com/video/4k9SXx2Erh20/ starting at 18:27...

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only problem i have with that is that its very common for artifacts to show up when you are streaming content (floor before the foot in this scenario). If we had a copy of the original recording (if they were keeping a physical copy that is), that is what i would investigate first. If it doesn't happen there, its just artifacts. It happens a LOT, and this stirs the pot even more in the wrong direction.

2
samlopes900se 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I get it but evidence is starting to add up. How about the perfect HD footage of the first shooting from a drone that just happened to just take off and aim directly at the location where it takes place. Quite the coincidence. Maybe more needs to be uncovered, but definitely worth investigating.

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't get me wrong, there is only one ultimate truth (Christ), i just don't want people to get worked up on that one thing to end up whitewashing all of the other things happening around this case that are obviously not organic. I feel like that is what is happening though; in a manner to discredit anyone else from looking into the whole picture

0
Hortance 0 points ago +1 / -1
  1. Prolly initiated before the verdict and confirmed/executed over the weekend. So what?
  2. FOX/Tucker and Kyle's advisors/attys...So what?
  3. Lin is suggesting that the interview shouldn't have occurred before the verdict but no time to do it before advertizing it on Friday night. BS. It would be totally legit to advertize the interview if it was agreed-to by Friday night, even before the interview was conducted....Suggesting something nefarious from those facts is stupid.

Notice the pattern....Questioning the validity of the interview. Questioning the motives of the participants. Throwing out a boogie man (David Hancock), smearing him and then asking lots of questions suggesting bad motives/actions....[Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it--Hello Alinsky tactic]

Interesting on no. 6. Is the interview bogus because Lin didn't get to challenge it in the story? He has his chance in this Telegram post, but all he does is use the Alinsky tactics without offering actual rebuttals.

Not sure what I think about Lin, but his post is devoid of solid facts challenging the info from the interview....It looks more like an Alinskyite lawyer saying "I don't like the interview".

-1
iideathyii -1 points ago +2 / -3

Lin wood is a fucking bandwagon jumping larper. Once a dem always a dem. I have seen nothing from him but disctractions and grifting.

-1
MAGAmagaEDKH -1 points ago +1 / -2

He is and always was a grifter