This again? Dude, give it a rest. It makes absolutely no sense, and it’s not like it’s hard to find people who look alike all over the internet. There are similarities, sure, but enough differences if you actually look closely.
The biggest issue is - WHY?
There is no reason for using the same woman for these interviews. No clear purpose or objective whatsoever. Nothing is accomplished by doing it.
You can’t just make wild ass claims and leave it as “prove me wrong.” It’s your job to convince other people that you’re right, and people who look alike isn’t proof of anything.
Each was involved in Nationally Covered mass shooting incident.
Each played the role of the 'Distraught Mother'
Each incident had numerous indicators that crisis actors were involved. Sandy Hook was unequivocally a false flag and saying otherwise makes you glow. Charleston had FBI faggots carrying tiki torches. lol
Each incident had numerous law enforcement and pols giving false statements and disseminating obvious propaganda.
Each incident spun into larger national narratives that continue to this day ( except Omaha ). Soto met Obama. Bro went on stage at the VMA's. Both pushing anti gun and anti White Male narratives.
Each town is located in what is considered DS territory and full Democrat control.
They don't look alike. They look the same. It's the same woman. She is an intelligence agent and she is good at her job. That is why she is used time and time again. Small circle. Trusted asset. This is how Intelligence services work.
You think 3 different women were randomly picked for major FF's and they just happen to look nearly identical or you think Sandy Hook and Charlottesville were legit and the key 'mother' figures looked nearly identical.
I never said SH wasn’t a false flag. My entire point is:
WHY? Why is the same woman used when it’s completely unnecessary? And even if the same woman was going to be used, then they would make her features look a bit different. Fake nose, colored contact lenses, glasses vs no glasses, etc. That is how intelligence services work. Not “oh hey let’s use the exact same person everywhere and she’ll just look the same. I’m sure no one will notice. Good luck!”
And you just said it yourself at the end:
the key ‘mother’ figures looked nearly identical.
That’s my point exactly - nearly
The look alike evidence that's popped up since Sandy Hook is lazy research. It's just saying person A looks like person B. Whether or not someone looks like someone else is subjective.
Adam Lanza was supposedly four different people. His brother Ryan, EA Sports shooter David Katz, Marcus Grimmie and some think he is really David Hogg. It's all subjective.
It's completely unnecessary to place trusted assets in False Flags that spin off into years old narratives, where the asset goes live on stage at the VMA's and meets the President ?
No.. It's quite necessary to use trusted assets in carefully planned and executed False Flags.
What makes you think they are attempting to cover their tracks? They are not. They are rubbing your nose in it. David Wheeler, for example. Time has proven that THERE IS NOTHING THE PUBLIC CAN DO ABOUT IT.
The President of the United States was involved. lol
I didn’t realize I was dealing with an IC insider and a genius tactician. I guess I’ll just have to default to your logic so that we’re on the same page -
This again? Dude, give it a rest. It makes absolutely no sense, and it’s not like it’s hard to find people who look alike all over the internet. There are similarities, sure, but enough differences if you actually look closely.
The biggest issue is - WHY?
There is no reason for using the same woman for these interviews. No clear purpose or objective whatsoever. Nothing is accomplished by doing it.
You can’t just make wild ass claims and leave it as “prove me wrong.” It’s your job to convince other people that you’re right, and people who look alike isn’t proof of anything.
Each was involved in Nationally Covered mass shooting incident.
Each played the role of the 'Distraught Mother'
Each incident had numerous indicators that crisis actors were involved. Sandy Hook was unequivocally a false flag and saying otherwise makes you glow. Charleston had FBI faggots carrying tiki torches. lol
Each incident had numerous law enforcement and pols giving false statements and disseminating obvious propaganda.
Each incident spun into larger national narratives that continue to this day ( except Omaha ). Soto met Obama. Bro went on stage at the VMA's. Both pushing anti gun and anti White Male narratives.
Each town is located in what is considered DS territory and full Democrat control.
They don't look alike. They look the same. It's the same woman. She is an intelligence agent and she is good at her job. That is why she is used time and time again. Small circle. Trusted asset. This is how Intelligence services work.
You think 3 different women were randomly picked for major FF's and they just happen to look nearly identical or you think Sandy Hook and Charlottesville were legit and the key 'mother' figures looked nearly identical.
I never said SH wasn’t a false flag. My entire point is:
WHY? Why is the same woman used when it’s completely unnecessary? And even if the same woman was going to be used, then they would make her features look a bit different. Fake nose, colored contact lenses, glasses vs no glasses, etc. That is how intelligence services work. Not “oh hey let’s use the exact same person everywhere and she’ll just look the same. I’m sure no one will notice. Good luck!”
And you just said it yourself at the end:
the key ‘mother’ figures looked nearly identical.
That’s my point exactly - nearly
The look alike evidence that's popped up since Sandy Hook is lazy research. It's just saying person A looks like person B. Whether or not someone looks like someone else is subjective.
Adam Lanza was supposedly four different people. His brother Ryan, EA Sports shooter David Katz, Marcus Grimmie and some think he is really David Hogg. It's all subjective.
It's completely unnecessary to place trusted assets in False Flags that spin off into years old narratives, where the asset goes live on stage at the VMA's and meets the President ?
No.. It's quite necessary to use trusted assets in carefully planned and executed False Flags.
What makes you think they are attempting to cover their tracks? They are not. They are rubbing your nose in it. David Wheeler, for example. Time has proven that THERE IS NOTHING THE PUBLIC CAN DO ABOUT IT.
The President of the United States was involved. lol
You are actually not a very bright person.
I didn’t realize I was dealing with an IC insider and a genius tactician. I guess I’ll just have to default to your logic so that we’re on the same page -
You’re retarded. Prove me wrong.