You may want to check your own premise:

Trump's team launched one lawsuit in each contested state none of which were heard. It went to the supreme court where it wasn't heard. Rudy Giuliani alone laid out the case for election fraud plainly and clearly continuously for about a month on his own channel (in between ads for cigars, granted).

When Giuliani brought his case before a Federal Court in Pennsylvania, this is what he said to the Judge:

"No, your honor, we are not" alleging fraud, Giuliani said, after Brann reminded him a newer version of the Trump campaign's lawsuit cut back those claims. It's a "fraudulent process," Giuliani continued.

You can find t hat fact in almost every article about Giuliani's Nov. 17th appearance before the Federal Court.

His odd PA press conference in front of the busted down Four Seasons landscaping business also was lackluster and underwhelming.

By the way, also documented in several other state cases, the Trump campaign lawyers made similar statements that the case was not about election fraud. You can read that fact in the record for your self.

From Powell's Kraken, to Lindell's cyber symposium, to Lindell's alleged Supreme Court case, to Trump Campaign's Court appearances, to the AZ Audit Result Hearing, etc. They seemingly stop short on presenting definitive evidence of election fraud.

Why?

When and where will the evidenced be presented?

How does this fit in to the winning strategy and The Plan?

Are all of these public efforts by these folks just sideshows to keep the DS busy, occupied and spinning?

What are the possible scenarios here?