Yes. That's the way it is with all exposures of reality. It doesn't take much. And you can't do it. Give me the photograph taken from the Empire State Building of the Eiffel Tower. Show me the photograph of the coast of Africa taken from the coast of Florida. Show me the photograph of Mt. Rainier taken from Hawaii. All it takes is a good telescope and a camera, if you are right---but you don't have any such proofs. They would be pathetically easy to accomplish, but you just don't have them, do you? You ought to think about that.
I also thought of something we haven't discussed: seismic determination of the structure of the Earth. We have a crust, beneath which is a mantle, under which is a core, divided into liquid and solid portions. We derive this picture from sound waves that travel throughout the inner earth to all regions of the world, so the data is compared and integrated. No flat earth results from all this.
We also haven't talked about the fact that it is impossible to accurately present large areas of the Earth on flat maps, because of the distortions resulting from flattening the spherical trigonometry into plane trigonometry. All the map projection systems are approximations, some better than others (the best being polyhedral projections). Why would this be the case, if the geometry is flat to begin with?
Since I am not a "shill" (whatever that is supposed to mean), you are free as a bird. Air quality also affects refraction over the horizon, which can happen (and does, dramatically for radar). Or are you unaware? Your arguments about air quality are pathetically convenient and self-serving. You have no attempted photos? How about from higher altitude? A photo from a plane over Europe showing the tip of South Africa? Flying from Buenos Aires to Durban and logging the distance---then comparing it to your gramophone record map of the Earth to see if it matches. How is it I can come up with all these tests, and you can't come up with anything?
You haven't presented any evidence for a flat earth. If I walk out my door, what is the first thing I can see that can only be true of a flat earth? You haven't been able to give a single thing. Meanwhile, there are numerous things that can only be true of a round earth.
The main problem is that we have people flying AROUND the globe and traveling in orbits AROUND the globe, which you really can't deny if you are honest and not suffering from a tremendous paranoid delusion. Do you use GPS navigation? From satellites. Impossible with land installations. Satellites are impossible with a flat earth (or at least they would be so contrived, they wouldn't work). How do you explain our close-up photos of other planets if our probes are not supposed to have gotten beyond the "firmament"? You must be walking around like a lunatic escaped from an asylum, seeing things that you find impossible to believe. I'm sorry for you. You have allowed yourself to be bamboozled by people who very probably are just leading you on, successful only because you are so ignorant of basic physics. You are literally in a spot where you cannot and will not accept evidence contrary to your cult belief.
I know. You don't read, you listen to videos. You are illiterate and expect everyone else to be illiterate. I spent time making things like the YAL-1A happen. I'm not sure morons know what that means.
Yes. That's the way it is with all exposures of reality. It doesn't take much. And you can't do it. Give me the photograph taken from the Empire State Building of the Eiffel Tower. Show me the photograph of the coast of Africa taken from the coast of Florida. Show me the photograph of Mt. Rainier taken from Hawaii. All it takes is a good telescope and a camera, if you are right---but you don't have any such proofs. They would be pathetically easy to accomplish, but you just don't have them, do you? You ought to think about that.
I also thought of something we haven't discussed: seismic determination of the structure of the Earth. We have a crust, beneath which is a mantle, under which is a core, divided into liquid and solid portions. We derive this picture from sound waves that travel throughout the inner earth to all regions of the world, so the data is compared and integrated. No flat earth results from all this.
We also haven't talked about the fact that it is impossible to accurately present large areas of the Earth on flat maps, because of the distortions resulting from flattening the spherical trigonometry into plane trigonometry. All the map projection systems are approximations, some better than others (the best being polyhedral projections). Why would this be the case, if the geometry is flat to begin with?
Atmosphere/air quality affects your viewing distance… need to think harder.
It’s alright to ignore all evidence presented to you. Cheers, blue pill wins.
Not going any more time with a shill.
Since I am not a "shill" (whatever that is supposed to mean), you are free as a bird. Air quality also affects refraction over the horizon, which can happen (and does, dramatically for radar). Or are you unaware? Your arguments about air quality are pathetically convenient and self-serving. You have no attempted photos? How about from higher altitude? A photo from a plane over Europe showing the tip of South Africa? Flying from Buenos Aires to Durban and logging the distance---then comparing it to your gramophone record map of the Earth to see if it matches. How is it I can come up with all these tests, and you can't come up with anything?
You haven't presented any evidence for a flat earth. If I walk out my door, what is the first thing I can see that can only be true of a flat earth? You haven't been able to give a single thing. Meanwhile, there are numerous things that can only be true of a round earth.
The main problem is that we have people flying AROUND the globe and traveling in orbits AROUND the globe, which you really can't deny if you are honest and not suffering from a tremendous paranoid delusion. Do you use GPS navigation? From satellites. Impossible with land installations. Satellites are impossible with a flat earth (or at least they would be so contrived, they wouldn't work). How do you explain our close-up photos of other planets if our probes are not supposed to have gotten beyond the "firmament"? You must be walking around like a lunatic escaped from an asylum, seeing things that you find impossible to believe. I'm sorry for you. You have allowed yourself to be bamboozled by people who very probably are just leading you on, successful only because you are so ignorant of basic physics. You are literally in a spot where you cannot and will not accept evidence contrary to your cult belief.
Not reading your probably terrible novel. Learn to code, shill ( we all know what that means, moron).
I know. You don't read, you listen to videos. You are illiterate and expect everyone else to be illiterate. I spent time making things like the YAL-1A happen. I'm not sure morons know what that means.