threatening people into compliance is not evil. it is the basis of our entire justice system.
All of your ideas about the world are terrible.
Laws aren't threats, they're boundaries most people agree upon because it's for the good of everybody. Breaking them puts other people in danger so there are punishments for it.
I don't murder people because there's a law against it; it's morally and ethically wrong. There should be a punishment in place for transgressing that, which is why there is.
Some phony-baloney plandemic with a controversial "vaccine" doesn't give Aubrey the moral right or justification to threaten people with uncovering their medical records into compliance. She doesn't have that authority and there are laws in place specifically to prevent people from using information like that against employees. And this isn't the plague so "severity of threat" doesn't supersede law.
Stop justifying morally bankrupt threats with false equivalencies to how actual laws of justice work.
There are different magnitudes of evil. For evil to exist, a person committing said actions need only be aware of what they're doing + its negative impact on others, and yet remain completely lacking in remorse.
Which is why laws are in place. Are you actually fucking retarded? Are you reading to what you're replying to?
Also, 15-year old, stop talking like you did five tours in 'Nam. I'm 40, I've seen plenty of shit in my life, too. Evil isn't just one concrete absolute idea, it's pervasive and perverse, it louses it's way into everything because it manifests in a million ways.
Evil can be a lot of things, and someone threatening compliance via breaking co-workers' medical privacy is pretty fucking evil. It's not throwing puppies in a fire for kicks but it's still evil.
All of your ideas about the world are terrible.
Laws aren't threats, they're boundaries most people agree upon because it's for the good of everybody. Breaking them puts other people in danger so there are punishments for it.
I don't murder people because there's a law against it; it's morally and ethically wrong. There should be a punishment in place for transgressing that, which is why there is.
Some phony-baloney plandemic with a controversial "vaccine" doesn't give Aubrey the moral right or justification to threaten people with uncovering their medical records into compliance. She doesn't have that authority and there are laws in place specifically to prevent people from using information like that against employees. And this isn't the plague so "severity of threat" doesn't supersede law.
Stop justifying morally bankrupt threats with false equivalencies to how actual laws of justice work.
#y'all
Oh look, there goes the point.
There are different magnitudes of evil. For evil to exist, a person committing said actions need only be aware of what they're doing + its negative impact on others, and yet remain completely lacking in remorse.
...
Which is why laws are in place. Are you actually fucking retarded? Are you reading to what you're replying to?
Also, 15-year old, stop talking like you did five tours in 'Nam. I'm 40, I've seen plenty of shit in my life, too. Evil isn't just one concrete absolute idea, it's pervasive and perverse, it louses it's way into everything because it manifests in a million ways.
Evil can be a lot of things, and someone threatening compliance via breaking co-workers' medical privacy is pretty fucking evil. It's not throwing puppies in a fire for kicks but it's still evil.