Or created later and foisted upon him to create a 'provenance' and, as you say, a decoy.
I would go with this. If someone were to do a word history on this and find out when it became commonly used for the first time, I bet you will find that time period very interesting. For some reason, I am thinking Elizabethan times.
That would figure, lots of recrafting going on then linguistically. It'd been a turbulent time with Henry on the throne and the separation from Rome, probably had to do the same brainwashing with the populace then as now with the amount of Religion changes they were meant to accept from ruler to ruler (or whim to whim).
Looking back to the Tudor time, and the number of movies they have made about the Tudors, I am pretty sure there were invisible hands behind the whole whole Anne Boleyn saga. No woman, no matter how amazing she is, would be able to make the King of England split off from the Catholic Church and create his own Church.
My guess is this. 1666 was the numerological deadline for the Cabal to restart their reign on humanity. They needed a lot of changes to happen before that. They had to chip away at the English throne, separate it from the HRE, build up resistance to the Catholic Church and start making some social changes in preparation.
Tudors were almost 100-150 years before that. The Cabal did not have that much power then, so they could only work behind the scenes.
We need to remember that marriages were fundamental to stability of the empires in those days.
Things that destablisied the power structure, slowly.
Annulment to Catherine (Weaken the political connection and stability)
Breaking off from the Vatican and creating Church of England (Weaken the temporal connection and stability)
Illness and death of Edward and ascension of Elizabeth (More instability by putting an unmarried girl into power. Possibly the first Cabal puppet in the British Crown).
Rise of popularity and influence of Francis Bacon - the first serious NWO ideology, and the real architect of the American Colony
Latter part of renaissance and early part of industrial revolution has the hallmarks of a Central Bank funded venture. Would be interesting to see what the sovereign debt of England was by 1666
Royal Soceity was created in 1660 - clearly could not have happened without the events of the past century.
Shakespeare:
Push the concept of love marriage (destabilise social stability of that time via arranged marriages)
Push various precursors to literary liberalism
Created works on various previous British Monarchs. These have become solidified in popular memory. If they wanted to rewrite history, perfect oppurtunity
Works such as Macbeth clearly Satanic (or atleast the very early satanic influences)
Rise of English language - make Latin more obscure for "normies". Make it hard for people to access the scientific knowledge of the times. Set the foundation for new precursors to "progressive" science
Wow, that was a great write up, you're very knowledgeable in this! Apologies for the delay, your reply caused me to revisit a load of wabbit holes I hadn't visited in years.
I'd always wondered if there were machinations behind Henry VII's situation, as you say it reeks of a cabal-esque coup ('follow the wives' earliest historical reference?). The lengths to which history was purged and re-written seems to indicate this was a major turning point, and victory, for the hidden hand.
I have a feeling Edward VI has been whitewashed by cabal history too- I've seen books that reference him as extremely devout and much maligned rather than the weak soul we see depicted. After all, who's to tell the difference of a few years carbon dating a painting after all this time, they could much more easily alter the historical record in real time back then- same playbook as now- repeat the lie until it's truth, paint over all evidence and kill all who disagree.
Onto the end of your timeline we can also put one of the plagues- the black death of 1665-6, and subsequently the Great Fire of 1666, these would of course not aid the sovereign debt you reference.
This likely led (in the end) to the formation of the Bank of England 1694 and we've all been robbed blind ever since. The decodingsymbols guy linked an early comm to Jupiter's moons and the De Medici children which paired with the Bank's formation IIRC. Very early comms! I have a feeling that the little 'miniature portraits' may have contained signs and symbols indicative of allegiances, beliefs and potentially messages.
All paintings of the day are rich in symbolism, heraldry and semiotics. I've often thought they were communicating preferences and compatibility to each other in advance of meeting- explains the failure rate of betrothals of the day.
On a minor tangent, the rise of Bacon and the very good points you make connected to Shakespeare may well not be unconnected. I was just browsing the parallels between the two and found this:
The Secret Code Hidden In Shakespeare's Plays | Cracking The Shakespeare Code:
I would go with this. If someone were to do a word history on this and find out when it became commonly used for the first time, I bet you will find that time period very interesting. For some reason, I am thinking Elizabethan times.
That would figure, lots of recrafting going on then linguistically. It'd been a turbulent time with Henry on the throne and the separation from Rome, probably had to do the same brainwashing with the populace then as now with the amount of Religion changes they were meant to accept from ruler to ruler (or whim to whim).
Looking back to the Tudor time, and the number of movies they have made about the Tudors, I am pretty sure there were invisible hands behind the whole whole Anne Boleyn saga. No woman, no matter how amazing she is, would be able to make the King of England split off from the Catholic Church and create his own Church.
My guess is this. 1666 was the numerological deadline for the Cabal to restart their reign on humanity. They needed a lot of changes to happen before that. They had to chip away at the English throne, separate it from the HRE, build up resistance to the Catholic Church and start making some social changes in preparation.
Tudors were almost 100-150 years before that. The Cabal did not have that much power then, so they could only work behind the scenes.
We need to remember that marriages were fundamental to stability of the empires in those days.
Things that destablisied the power structure, slowly.
Annulment to Catherine (Weaken the political connection and stability)
Breaking off from the Vatican and creating Church of England (Weaken the temporal connection and stability)
Illness and death of Edward and ascension of Elizabeth (More instability by putting an unmarried girl into power. Possibly the first Cabal puppet in the British Crown).
Rise of popularity and influence of Francis Bacon - the first serious NWO ideology, and the real architect of the American Colony
Latter part of renaissance and early part of industrial revolution has the hallmarks of a Central Bank funded venture. Would be interesting to see what the sovereign debt of England was by 1666
Royal Soceity was created in 1660 - clearly could not have happened without the events of the past century.
Shakespeare:
Push the concept of love marriage (destabilise social stability of that time via arranged marriages)
Push various precursors to literary liberalism
Created works on various previous British Monarchs. These have become solidified in popular memory. If they wanted to rewrite history, perfect oppurtunity
Works such as Macbeth clearly Satanic (or atleast the very early satanic influences)
Rise of English language - make Latin more obscure for "normies". Make it hard for people to access the scientific knowledge of the times. Set the foundation for new precursors to "progressive" science
Wow, that was a great write up, you're very knowledgeable in this! Apologies for the delay, your reply caused me to revisit a load of wabbit holes I hadn't visited in years.
I'd always wondered if there were machinations behind Henry VII's situation, as you say it reeks of a cabal-esque coup ('follow the wives' earliest historical reference?). The lengths to which history was purged and re-written seems to indicate this was a major turning point, and victory, for the hidden hand.
I have a feeling Edward VI has been whitewashed by cabal history too- I've seen books that reference him as extremely devout and much maligned rather than the weak soul we see depicted. After all, who's to tell the difference of a few years carbon dating a painting after all this time, they could much more easily alter the historical record in real time back then- same playbook as now- repeat the lie until it's truth, paint over all evidence and kill all who disagree.
Onto the end of your timeline we can also put one of the plagues- the black death of 1665-6, and subsequently the Great Fire of 1666, these would of course not aid the sovereign debt you reference.
This likely led (in the end) to the formation of the Bank of England 1694 and we've all been robbed blind ever since. The decodingsymbols guy linked an early comm to Jupiter's moons and the De Medici children which paired with the Bank's formation IIRC. Very early comms! I have a feeling that the little 'miniature portraits' may have contained signs and symbols indicative of allegiances, beliefs and potentially messages.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/18/d8/06/18d80634ad7109a5fb36e57d42c83530.jpg
All paintings of the day are rich in symbolism, heraldry and semiotics. I've often thought they were communicating preferences and compatibility to each other in advance of meeting- explains the failure rate of betrothals of the day.
On a minor tangent, the rise of Bacon and the very good points you make connected to Shakespeare may well not be unconnected. I was just browsing the parallels between the two and found this:
The Secret Code Hidden In Shakespeare's Plays | Cracking The Shakespeare Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNL0XODSMwU&t=2026s (pt 1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tT0EuyQ9lZs (pt 2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubhfGcTsJYE (pt 3)
It makes interesting conclusions (which I won't spoil unless you want a TLDR)