For a year everyone in here has been assblasting the media for using the term qanon. Then Flynn says qannon is fake and everyone loses their collective shit.
We only care about quality here, not so much quantity to avoid the fascistic side of mob rule. 'Everyone' implies some sort of consensus. Pigeonholing maybe? 'Collective' is a word straight from the Communist handbook. IS there some sort of expectation that Q Anons have a singular opinion a la NPC programming? Sorry to break it to you, The face of QAnon has blue and red paint and horned headgear, according to the MSM. Like all those congregating antivaxxers, Q and the anons discussing it, is actually a ragtag bunch with a whole spectrum of opinions, as surprised-sounding reporters breathlessly report, in their rush to condemn the outcasts. Once upon a time, a man was burnt at the stake for stating that the world was spherical....THAT is everyone deciding something collectively.
Well. it ain't in German, French or even Latin. The point is that Q is like asking a Question. Anons then discuss amongst themselves. QAnon is the media's attempt to paint a picture. My previous post has a political science twist: Fascism (now labelled as Public Private Partnership) and Communism (Green New Deal-ish and woke stuff) are so last century. So by pointing these preconceptions out, iin the quote that "everyone loses their collective shit" concludes that such blanket statements lie far outside the Q spectrum that is all about decentralisation and more importantly: a bunch of individuals.
For a year everyone in here has been assblasting the media for using the term qanon. Then Flynn says qannon is fake and everyone loses their collective shit.
Back to our regularly scheduled programming.
Its good wasp spray for the shills I say, it makes them glow in the dark.
We only care about quality here, not so much quantity to avoid the fascistic side of mob rule. 'Everyone' implies some sort of consensus. Pigeonholing maybe? 'Collective' is a word straight from the Communist handbook. IS there some sort of expectation that Q Anons have a singular opinion a la NPC programming? Sorry to break it to you, The face of QAnon has blue and red paint and horned headgear, according to the MSM. Like all those congregating antivaxxers, Q and the anons discussing it, is actually a ragtag bunch with a whole spectrum of opinions, as surprised-sounding reporters breathlessly report, in their rush to condemn the outcasts. Once upon a time, a man was burnt at the stake for stating that the world was spherical....THAT is everyone deciding something collectively.
Well. it ain't in German, French or even Latin. The point is that Q is like asking a Question. Anons then discuss amongst themselves. QAnon is the media's attempt to paint a picture. My previous post has a political science twist: Fascism (now labelled as Public Private Partnership) and Communism (Green New Deal-ish and woke stuff) are so last century. So by pointing these preconceptions out, iin the quote that "everyone loses their collective shit" concludes that such blanket statements lie far outside the Q spectrum that is all about decentralisation and more importantly: a bunch of individuals.
Was that a rhetorical question or do you genuinely not know what I was saying?
Thanks for your time i guess.