Imagine a world where a government agency couldn't control the progress of drug development. The same government that is utterly corrupt in every aspect controls the medications that get approved and by which companies. So you think the government has corrupt courts, intel agencies, rigged elections, and is working to genocide you, but those same people should control your access to life saving medicine.
I don't support anything about the current system that has been so corrupted, I just know we have enemies and the free market cant protect us from an intentionally malicious company, what do you propose?
There will be intentionally malicious companies in any system. The government system allows those people to have a monopoly, use government force to kill competition, and have corrupt scientists rubberstamp safety protocols. A free market system will still have malicious companies, but smaller competitors will be better able to compete without being suffocated by regulation. Free market safety rating companies would exist to fill the same role as the FDA, but would be far more transparent and reliable. The free market is a better alternative to government in nearly any situation, if not all. Its not that FM is perfect. But government is inherently corrupt and inept, and then gains a monopoly and turns tyrannical. My 2 cents
Free market would be better.
Not in a world where things like the CCP and globalists exist. Imagine how much faster they could kill us with zero oversight to fudge.
Imagine a world where a government agency couldn't control the progress of drug development. The same government that is utterly corrupt in every aspect controls the medications that get approved and by which companies. So you think the government has corrupt courts, intel agencies, rigged elections, and is working to genocide you, but those same people should control your access to life saving medicine.
Make it make sense.
I don't support anything about the current system that has been so corrupted, I just know we have enemies and the free market cant protect us from an intentionally malicious company, what do you propose?
There will be intentionally malicious companies in any system. The government system allows those people to have a monopoly, use government force to kill competition, and have corrupt scientists rubberstamp safety protocols. A free market system will still have malicious companies, but smaller competitors will be better able to compete without being suffocated by regulation. Free market safety rating companies would exist to fill the same role as the FDA, but would be far more transparent and reliable. The free market is a better alternative to government in nearly any situation, if not all. Its not that FM is perfect. But government is inherently corrupt and inept, and then gains a monopoly and turns tyrannical. My 2 cents
FDA has some value if it's properly regulated and doesn't have this much power.
A regulated regulatory body that forces companies to essentially not put Asbestos into their products is a positive.
Unfortunately they went way too far and got way too powerful..which is pretty common in corrupt government.