Haha! Another fail.
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (72)
sorted by:
You're intentionally missing the point. A Tesla has less than 8 hours with that heater cranked and zero driving. For the storms I've been trapped in in a 4x4 truck, that would be a 100% failure rate with a Tesla assuming a tow truck dropped me off in the storm with a full battery.
I'm not, you're lying but I don't think it's intentional. A teaka has 70+ hours of just sitting there with the heater cranked. Probably overc100 hours.
Side by side comparison, a gas car will run out before a battery. Especially considetingvtgecelectriccstarted the day full most gas cars don't.
I drive my 4x4 tesla at the highest suspension setting and it gets better winter mileage than my chevy truck.
Your mistake is thinking cars use more power to sit still and heat for 8 hours than your house uses in 8 days. That's just bad math. Cars are much smaller, more efficient, and you aren't running refrigerators and microwaves and water heaters all at once, so they use much less power.
I don't blame you, deep state propaganda feeds lies like that constantly and a lot of people get fooled by the media. Its maybe opec, maybe old fashioned greedy lues, but whatever the point of the propaganda you will see through them the next time you hear it. I'm just surprised to hear propaganda repeated here, usually this crowd is more immune.
Heater circuit on a model 3 is 240V x 21A = 5kwh, so yes I was off I didn't realize the base model battery was over 50kwh.
Also like all electronics they aren't at full power constantly.
There's a major plot point in the movie Apollo 13 where Gary Senise does this, balancing start-up power on power draw so things that need to be on don't spike over some limit. Power on spike is much more than stable low power draw.
No different than your house.
Who is paying you to shill electric vehicles here? Or are you just another brain dead muskovite?