The original study references the United States, VAERS, and v-safe, not the UK, I think.
Discussion
"This U.S. surveillance review of the safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines during pregnancy and the periconception period indicates that some pregnant persons in the United States are choosing to be vaccinated against Covid-19 in all trimesters of pregnancy.
Solicited local and systemic reactions that were reported to the v-safe surveillance system were similar among persons who identified as pregnant and nonpregnant women.
Although not directly comparable, the proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (e.g., fetal loss, preterm birth, small size for gestational age, congenital anomalies, and neonatal death) among participants with completed pregnancies from the v-safe pregnancy registry appear to be similar to the published incidences in pregnant populations studied before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Many participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry were included in the phase 1a (highest) priority group for Covid-19 vaccination owing to their work as health care personnel.
V-safe participation is voluntary, and registration information is not uniformly available at all vaccination locations, although information about the surveillance system is included on the EUA fact sheets for health care providers and patients."
That’s if the data on who has been vaccinated is correct or not. If they can fudge the numbers for miscarriage, they can easily fudge the numbers on vaccination rates.
We have multiple studies now where they say “oopsie our bad” six months after they’ve been published in journals and used for decision making. I guarantee vaccination rates are being fudged for the agenda as well.
I agree with you there. I will say I do know one woman who miscarried after vaccination and another who gave birth to a child with a very serious electrical problem with his heart. I know another one who, thankfully, her daughter isn’t having issues as far as I know. But 2/3 of all the pregnant women I know have either miscarried or their children have had cardiovascular issues, and they both got the vaccine during pregnancy. Both also had healthy children and normal pregnancies before the pandemic.
That's 91% of the clot-shotted.
About two thirds of the country are still pure bloods.
As soon as people started getting the death shots,
miscarriages among them
*immediately
shot to the 70s% range.
That later went up into the low 80s,
now it's revealed to be in the 90s.
But you don't believe everyone's been paying attention and monitoring all these audits for accuracy, all this time?
The fact that MSM refuses to talk about it at all is a good indicator it's all true.
People are talking about it all over the world, and have been since the very first returns came back as at LEAST 70s % were having miscarriages.
The original study references the United States, VAERS, and v-safe, not the UK, I think.
Discussion
"This U.S. surveillance review of the safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines during pregnancy and the periconception period indicates that some pregnant persons in the United States are choosing to be vaccinated against Covid-19 in all trimesters of pregnancy.
Solicited local and systemic reactions that were reported to the v-safe surveillance system were similar among persons who identified as pregnant and nonpregnant women.
Although not directly comparable, the proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (e.g., fetal loss, preterm birth, small size for gestational age, congenital anomalies, and neonatal death) among participants with completed pregnancies from the v-safe pregnancy registry appear to be similar to the published incidences in pregnant populations studied before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Many participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry were included in the phase 1a (highest) priority group for Covid-19 vaccination owing to their work as health care personnel.
V-safe participation is voluntary, and registration information is not uniformly available at all vaccination locations, although information about the surveillance system is included on the EUA fact sheets for health care providers and patients."
This table on the same page won't render when copied here but this is who the v-safe people are.
Table 3
Characteristics of V-safe Pregnancy Registry Participants.*
CharacteristicPfizer–BioNTech VaccineModerna VaccineTotal
number (percent)
Total2136 (54.0)1822 (46.0)3958 (100)
Age at first vaccine dose†
20–24 yr17 (0.8)19 (1.0)36 (0.9)
25–34 yr1335 (62.5)1238 (67.9)2573 (65.0)
35–44 yr777 (36.4)560 (30.7)1337 (33.8)
45–54 yr7 (0.3)5 (0.3)12 (0.3)
Race and ethnic group‡
Non-Hispanic White1663 (77.9)1463 (80.3)3126 (79.0)
Hispanic164 (7.7)151 (8.3)315 (8.0)
Non-Hispanic Asian225 (10.5)138 (7.6)363 (9.2)
Non-Hispanic Black24 (1.1)26 (1.4)50 (1.3)
Non-Hispanic multiple races42 (2.0)30 (1.6)72 (1.8)
Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaskan Native5 (0.2)1 (0.1)6 (0.2)
Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander6 (0.3)3 (0.2)9 (0.2)
Missing data or participant declined to answer7 (0.3)10 (0.5)17 (0.4)
Timing of first eligible dose
Periconception: within 30 days before last menstrual period55 (2.6)37 (2.0)92 (2.3)
First trimester: <14 wk615 (28.8)517 (28.4)1132 (28.6)
Second trimester: ≥14 and <28 wk932 (43.6)782 (42.9)1714 (43.3)
Third trimester: ≥28 wk533 (25.0)486 (26.7)1019 (25.7)
Missing data1 (<0.1)01 (<0.1)
Covid-19 infection during pregnancy
No Covid-19 infection2084 (97.6)1779 (97.6)3863 (97.6)
Before vaccination32 (1.5)24 (1.3)56 (1.4)
≤14 days after first eligible dose of vaccination3 (0.1)7 (0.4)10 (0.3)
14 days after first eligible dose of vaccination9 (0.4)3 (0.2)12 (0.3)
That's the original study that was FAKED to HIDE the extremely high miscarriage rates.
Again: only a couple of months into the death-shot program the miscarriage numbers started OUT - at LEAST in the low 70s percent range.
If there were glaring errors in the real numbers someone among the hundreds of thousands reviewing them,
would have discovered them by now.
That’s if the data on who has been vaccinated is correct or not. If they can fudge the numbers for miscarriage, they can easily fudge the numbers on vaccination rates.
We have multiple studies now where they say “oopsie our bad” six months after they’ve been published in journals and used for decision making. I guarantee vaccination rates are being fudged for the agenda as well.
I agree with you there. I will say I do know one woman who miscarried after vaccination and another who gave birth to a child with a very serious electrical problem with his heart. I know another one who, thankfully, her daughter isn’t having issues as far as I know. But 2/3 of all the pregnant women I know have either miscarried or their children have had cardiovascular issues, and they both got the vaccine during pregnancy. Both also had healthy children and normal pregnancies before the pandemic.