Let's apply some logical questioning to try to come to a reasonable assumption:
If the satellites were limited in the way terrestrial antennas/transmitters are, why would there be 100,000 satellites emitting the same frequencies back towards the earth? If they could not serve their purpose, why would that be their purpose?
i'M pReTtY sUrE they don't have the same limitations since they're there doing that, so far far far far away (a smidge outside 300m). Could it be a regulation difference between terrestrial and space equipment? I would think it has to do with signal/frequency density. BECAUSE they're so far away, they can turn the dial up as the frequency disperses and weakens as it passes through the atmosphere.
Stand right beside a 5G antenna for a month and tell me about your health... if you can at that point.
Then again, maybe space is fake and 5G satellites in space is code for something else.
I can't stand beside a 5G antenna, as there are none around me, and I don't expect there to be any in the future. I could travel to one, but I'm surely not going to stand on a street corner just for your silly experiment.
The frequencies used by 5G have all been used for decades for multiple purposes. The problem with 5G is not the frequencies. It's the fact that higher frequencies are capable of carrying much more information. That is what makes the internet of things possible. Even your refrigerator will spy on you and report what you're eating to your insurance company.
Therefore, I don't have smart devices. All of my appliances are dumb, I have no TV at all, and I don't use a smart phone. The "smart grid" can't even get me, as I do a lot of electronic things by battery or solar power.
You should learn more about how frequency and frequency density can affect the human body on the cellular level. It will help make sense of my comment.
Keep fighting the good fight and have a great day, fren.
That may be the point of the 100,000 satellites.
I'm pretty sure the satellites will be more than 300 meters away. I still don't think I'll get any 5G at my house.
Let's apply some logical questioning to try to come to a reasonable assumption:
If the satellites were limited in the way terrestrial antennas/transmitters are, why would there be 100,000 satellites emitting the same frequencies back towards the earth? If they could not serve their purpose, why would that be their purpose?
i'M pReTtY sUrE they don't have the same limitations since they're there doing that, so far far far far away (a smidge outside 300m). Could it be a regulation difference between terrestrial and space equipment? I would think it has to do with signal/frequency density. BECAUSE they're so far away, they can turn the dial up as the frequency disperses and weakens as it passes through the atmosphere.
Stand right beside a 5G antenna for a month and tell me about your health... if you can at that point.
Then again, maybe space is fake and 5G satellites in space is code for something else.
I can't stand beside a 5G antenna, as there are none around me, and I don't expect there to be any in the future. I could travel to one, but I'm surely not going to stand on a street corner just for your silly experiment.
The frequencies used by 5G have all been used for decades for multiple purposes. The problem with 5G is not the frequencies. It's the fact that higher frequencies are capable of carrying much more information. That is what makes the internet of things possible. Even your refrigerator will spy on you and report what you're eating to your insurance company.
Therefore, I don't have smart devices. All of my appliances are dumb, I have no TV at all, and I don't use a smart phone. The "smart grid" can't even get me, as I do a lot of electronic things by battery or solar power.
You should learn more about how frequency and frequency density can affect the human body on the cellular level. It will help make sense of my comment.
Keep fighting the good fight and have a great day, fren.