Very interesting but how much is factual? So far I have gone full circle with Hitler being a deep state Rothschild bastard stooge to him trying to save god fearing Christians from evil occult Khazarian “Deepstate Jews”. Which one is it bc he can’t be both….
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
They funded both sides of the war. Just like most elites
That goes without saying for pretty much every major conflict. That does not automatically mean the people who took the funding was good or bad. A lot of times there was no other option when a war looms. You have to turn to the bankers or you will get destroyed.
Funding itself is them putting in the controls. You are beholden to them after that, and when you realise they are demanding their pound of flesh, what you do defines you.
In case of Hitler, many accounts suggest that he went against them and kicked them out and issued his own currency. This also explains why the whole world turned against him quickly. Even when the whole world was admiring him and making him a hero, he never made any secret that he wanted to invade Soviet Russia if they tried to expand westwards, and to take back the provinces lost after Versailles treaty (mostly in Poland).
It is much like whats playing out with Russia. They are creating a situation where Putin has no choice but to invade Ukraine, and when he does, the whole world will turn against him.
The quest for the art and riches