A simple reason as to why Trump keeps taking credit for his warp speed vax (because this topic keeps resurfacing). And, this is just my reasoning, no sauce.

posted 2 years ago by changeagent 2 years ago by changeagent +71 / -0

I keep seeing the question: Why is Trump taking credit for a vax that is killing people?

We have heard many explanations, including...

He's in on it.
He doesn't know the truth.
He had to do it so we weren't locked down for 5 year.
There are no deaths--that's all fake news from White Hats and the shots are saline (I heard this one just the other day).
He has to sound like he still approves of it otherwise the media crushes him.
A combination of the above.

Personally, I have always thought #5 was the most plausible explanation.

But my new thought is this: whoever smelt it, dealt it. Remember that from junior high? Same principle. Imagine if Trump came out against the vax and he highlighted the adverse effects. What would happen? He would be blamed. But by pretending to still praise it (while advocating for you to do your own research and make your own choice), he allows the blame to remain squarely on the pharmas and other bad actors. And if they try to blame him, he can say "All I did was clear the path to speed up the process... you're the ones who created poison."

He had to speed it up so they couldn't keep us locked down. And until he is back in the White House (which I still believe will happen), he must play "stupid".

Yes, people are dying and being maimed. But until Trump is in power and able to stop it, he can't do anything else except what he is doing. I have siad this before: I think his heart breaks anew each day that goes by that he is notable to stop it.

Thanks for reading. Have at it, Frens.

29 comments

29 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (29)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– Taffy333 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I doubt any batch of the vax is 'good', though some are apparently more immediately problematic than others. There have been reports that some only contained saline, including by a chemist who analyzed five different injections, three of which were saline only. I wouldn't want anything to do with what the other two contained.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– changeagent [S] 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Yeah, I think I am with you on all of that.

Do you ever think about the fact that we'll never know the truth? I mean, even if/when Trump is back, there isn't going to be a moment where the credits roll and we see who was playing what role. There won't be a "behind the scenes" DVD that explains it all.

▲ 3 ▼

– Taffy333 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

There'll probably be some credits and some 'behind the scenes' DVDs, but I doubt they'll tell us everything.

I'm not sure Trump will be back. I believe NCSWISC, but I'm not sure the final outcome includes Trump as more than perhaps a senior statesman. Don't ask me who I think would take his place, though, as I have no idea. And it may be we get an outcome with an entirely different paradigm than we've known, and that includes the end of the two-party system. We may get a completely different form of government, and if I had my way it would entirely be that of trust based on truth and respect (horses live this paradigm, which is where I learned the beauty of it).