Someone check my work on this, but the study you linked seems to show the opposite of what is being implied by the tweet.
I'm just looking at pages 15 and 16 and I'm just looking at the over 80 for an example. The paper says deaths for >80 is 189 unvaccinated 1,378 double jabbed.
But from page 16 it shows that that over 90% of the >80 population is vaxed. So that would mean 10% of them are unvaxed.
If the vaxed population has 1,378 deaths, then if the unvaxed had identical death rates you would expect ~153 deaths, but it's 189. So that looks slightly worse for the unvaxed. (someone correct me if I'm interpreting the data wrong)
Now I don't trust any of this data to begin with, so I doubt this is really the case. And I only bothered to do this for one age group. But if we're going to use their own data against them, then we need to make sure the data says what we think it says.
Someone check my work on this, but the study you linked seems to show the opposite of what is being implied by the tweet.
I'm just looking at pages 15 and 16 and I'm just looking at the over 80 for an example. The paper says deaths for >80 is 189 unvaccinated 1,378 double jabbed. But from page 16 it shows that that over 90% of the >80 population is vaxed. So that would mean 10% of them are unvaxed.
If the vaxed population has 1,378 deaths, then if the unvaxed had identical death rates you would expect ~153 deaths, but it's 189. So that looks slightly worse for the unvaxed. (someone correct me if I'm interpreting the data wrong)
Now I don't trust any of this data to begin with, so I doubt this is really the case. And I only bothered to do this for one age group. But if we're going to use their own data against them, then we need to make sure the data says what we think it says.