Science can be a beautiful and useful thing, but like everything else, it too, can be corrupted. Climate science today is corrupted. There's just too much money involved. I can see a bright and wonderful future with free energy, here's for hoping that becomes a reality.
I did find this Interactive Map
I'm going to mess around with it, but I do wonder at the significance of duplicate city names..
Been hearing a lot about this, but honestly I'm still not sure on the significance. For reference here is a writeup about Nineveh
I guess it seems more strange to me that so many towns adopted the name, than the fact that this eclipse will pass over so many of those towns.
Something is definitely up, but I'm not sure what..
Well clearly all those countries are racist
Well when it's dems.. legal doesn't really mean anything
Yeah, the claim in the article is that ice weight towards the poles has melted which essentially moves the weight away from the poles, and the poles is the center of rotation. So move mass away from the center of rotation and the spinning body slows down. Again I think it's all a scam, but the claim itself makes logical sense
Well I mean spin around in a chair holding weights above your head. Then lower the weights to the side. See what happens to your rotation, even though everything "weighs the same".
Climate change is a scam, but redistributing weight on a spinning object will definitely affect it's speed of rotation.
Anyone in favor of this stuff is in favor of it because it will never affect them.
At the rate things are declining, in another 5 years we'll be seeing "Wyoming Has Become The 23rd State In The U.S. To Ban Ritual Sacrifice of your Firstborn".
How did this even become a thing that needed to be banned?!
The government doesn't pay for anything. They're digging around in our pockets and stealing. Yeah I definitely agree with you, why would the shipping company not be liable for all damages?
Even if they did that, most solar panels are a scam anyways. When you calculate how much energy it takes to mine, process, manufacture, and transport it would take about 5-10 years for the solar panel just to break even. Whenever a solar panel lasts less than that (in this case it looks like 10's of thousands fall into that category) then it loses net energy. And that's ignoring the huge costs of disposing of the panels at end of life, and even all of that is still subsidized by the US taxpayer.
So Trump had the gall to take out a loan, and then.. pay it back in full! I guess he actually was a crook all along. /s
Honestly he should not even have to pay a single penny, there was no crime.
Engoron plays all this off as if he's doing the right thing; making the hard decisions, and has integrity. He won't acknowledge his insane partisanship and corruption, I wonder if he has deluded himself enough that even he believes it?
I think most people here will get every single reference. Normies, not so much. Almost every line of this song was a MSM news headline at one point smh.
Most people think none of the court cases went anywhere because of lack of evidence. But in reality almost every case was thrown out due to having no standing. The courts didn't even look at the evidence.
Standing - In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have, by demonstrating to the court, sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case.
A party has standing in the following situations:
The party is directly subject to an adverse effect by the statute or action in question, and the harm suffered will continue unless the court grants relief in the form of damages or a finding that the law either does not apply to the party or that the law is void or can be nullified. In informal terms, a party must have something to lose. The party has standing because they will be directly harmed by the conditions for which they are asking the court for relief.
The party is not directly harmed by the conditions by which they are petitioning the court for relief but asks for it because the harm involved has some reasonable relation to their situation, and the continued existence of the harm may affect others who might not be able to ask a court for relief. In the United States, this is the grounds for asking for a law to be struck down as violating the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, because while the plaintiff might not be directly affected, the law might so adversely affect others that one might never know what was not done or created by those who fear they would become subject to the law. This is known as the "chilling effects" doctrine.
The party is granted automatic standing by act of law. For example, under some environmental laws in the United States, a party may sue someone causing pollution to certain waterways without a federal permit, even if the party suing is not harmed by the pollution being generated. The law allows the plaintiff to receive attorney's fees if they substantially prevail in the action. In some U.S. states, a person who believes a book, film or other work of art is obscene may sue in their own name to have the work banned directly without having to ask a District Attorney to do so.
I'm still not sure how that was ever justified. In my opinion, every single voter would have standing, but the courts wouldn't touch this.
This is such an insane situation! Even if you fully believed we should be taking in illegal aliens; why would you not give them a job instead of raping the taxpayers? President Trump can't get back into office soon enough, we really need him.
Maybe the precipice will be when they stop asking citizens to invite illegals into their homes, and start forcing them to.
That can be pretty difficult, for most 401k's the employer chooses who to go with. You could set up your own 401k, but then you'd lose out on employer matching.
It feels like the only viable solution to this is would be to make all the ESG crap that Blackrock comes up with illegal.. but that doesn't seem like a great solution either. Maybe trying to convince your employer to chose a different company for 401k's?
It's a hard problem, because to boycott them, you kind of have to actively lose money because of the whole matching of contributions by the employer.
Yeah, at a Trump rally there's more people waiting in line for the bathroom then there is total people at a Biden rally. (and I mean that literally)
I predict this will go "Deny, deny, deny, deny, deny... okay fine it's true, but you're transphobic if you can't just accept it"
I should add one more:
- Continued Education - I don't think this should be a one and done type of conversation. It's coming up that I should revisit this topic with my kid, so that's the whole reason I made this post.
They glom the word racist onto everything without evidence:
- Milk is racist
- Being on time is racist
- Math is racist
- Climate change is racist
And I've seen actual MSM news articles with all those examples 😒 When I come across a story that uses that word, and it is referring to actual legitimate racism, it's a surprise
Not to mention the nutritional side of that too. A box of Froot Loops has 306 grams of sugar. That's a full cup and a half of sugar. I'd take your recipe over that any day.
Haha, fair enough. (But hey, it still makes sense if you take it as he had no insight into what was happening at the capitol😜)
51:22 "Still to this day, the system that we live with, to this day, is built to facilitate child predators" .. "And no system is built by accident, systems and factories are not built without purpose"
Buyer's remorse times a million!