My theory: There is no virus. There is no vaccine.

posted 2 years ago by Donny_Fiasco 2 years ago by Donny_Fiasco +28 / -3

I'm going admittedly high altitude on this one.

This quote from Q Post 521 has always stuck with me.

NOT EVERYTHING WILL BE CLEAN. [SCARE] NECESSARY EVENT.

I believe the normal flu is the cover for the virus, and the virus "pandemic" is the necessary event, and the vaccine push is the push to wake the world up with SCARE tactics. Q mentions "scare tactics" endlessly through the posts.

I would be interested to see all these side effects from the "vaccines", put into real world terms.

In other words, are there significantly more cases of miocarditis than normal? How about lung inflammation? Strokes? What could these be normally attributed to that maybe are being noticed more because of the frequent doctors visits and testing? Do these fake vaccines cause small warning signs in people who were already sick but didn't know? Then they go to the hospital and are diagnosed?

How many cases of these side effects year over year? What if the numbers are similar?

This all may be one huge psyop to wake us up and save ourselves, but also cover for a real war going on behind the scenes.

78 comments

78 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (78)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Donny_Fiasco [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

And your analogy sucks but the way

Here's the correct analogy

There are dead bodies all over the place and we blame some guy that wasn't even there.

We know there's a murderer, but it obviously wasn't the guy that got named out of nowhere

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– ravonaf 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

My analogy is perfect. I only worry about that things I can control. The name doesn't matter to me as I know this thing exists and is real. You say it doesn't exist by the name people are calling it. Then what did I have? I would love to hear it.