I read am article way back when the Sussmam indictments came out from some guy into law that read the indictments. Basically he said that there way too much detailed evidence for this to be a one off indictment. It looked like it was going to lead into other evidence being presented and other indictments being opened. I haven't read it all but if I can find the article I'll post it here. Gotta knock over the first domino to topple the rest. Small fish to big fish. Change happens from bottom to top. Get rid of the lackeys and contingency plans so the big fish are cornered with no way out. At least that's how I understood it