It wasn't started that way. There is a lot of history that people don't know about. The cabal took over the main BTC project around 2015. Before that it was managed by a core group of developers who wanted to use bitcoin to liberate the world from private central banks. There was infiltration to the highest levels of the crypto industry and they took over with social media influencers mockingbird style spreading lies and drama all over the internet. They divided and conquered.
Since they split bitcoin into multiple forks and crippled the base layer protocol they ensured it could never scale with user adoption. Its actually a completely artificial limitation that was only put in to prevent DDoS spam attacks when the network was very young. This is what the Cabal will not concede under any circumstances and what caused the initial rift in the crypto space. People were mysteriously switching sides after arguing for removing the limitation in the software that could allow for guaranteed cheap transactions for everyone in the world, to supporting the "store of value" narrative. Bitcoin was suddenly trendy to "hodl" but not cool to spend. It became an investment vehicle.
There are still people working on ways for crypto to challenge fiat and the NWO but they don't get much attention. Same kind of media blackout you see in politics.
They would have no reason to reinvent the wheel, as they already own all the banks. If they wanted to have a massive pump and dump ponzi scheme they would have built something using their already centralized infrastructure, something like the stock market. But that too would have been a reinvention of the wheel.
It's pretty obvious that crypto is legit, just like it's predecessors created by libertarians and anti-bank folks, who got killed or arrested in the process. And if you look closely, you can see that they're treating it like precious metals, trying to associate it with tulips, buy in themselves and dump on the market to create volatility and stuff like that. All in pathetic attempts to scare people away.
The scaling debate and all the alt coins is yet another issue. Tho all that aside, I usually say that crypto is still the least terrible alternative in a cashless hell, where the only alternative would have been a bank. I've lost value, but I've also earned value simply because of holding, staking and mining.
A digital currency comes out. Supposedly created by some ghost figure named Satoshi. It is used as a transactional currency for human trafficking, drug trafficking, child porn, etc.
And you think a bunch of small investors are holding the lions share? 🤔
You don't think the cabal has been winning hand over fist with the pump and dumps? 🤔
You think that most people in the world have bitcoin and are ready to start using it?
Further that those who don't will be sharing it fees the economy?
No digital currency just "came out", what came out was the blueprints for a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, in combination with a piece of FOSS code to demonstrate the concept.
See this is like someone releasing 3D models for gun parts you can print in your own 3D printer. If you'd knew anything about guns you'd recognize the parts and could tell that they where legit. Yet still you're gonna have to deal with sheeples crying that those parts where released by the globalists... why would the globalists do that? They don't want you to have any freedom.
Same with cars, what stops you from building your own car from scratch, other than stupid government regulations and lack of required knowledge? And if you where to succeed on such project, does that mean your custom built car will be just as shitty as any mass produced shit car? of course not. The idea is just retarded.
Just throwing non pertinent t docs at the argument doesn't help your argument right?
So let's dumb this down.
Let's say a bunch of lfuel efficient cars were created. Early on about 1% of the human population got 90% of them. No more will ever be produced.
Now here is the quiz....
Who owns all the cars?
Who doesn't own the cars?
Do you think the 99% who don't own one of these fuel efficient cars would be willing to give up all current cars when their chances of getting one would be next to nil?
Okay let's play your game then, each car and it's owner is listed on a public blockchain as a anonymous key, just like this one: 3J65t1WtEk25CNmQviecrnyiWadfRhWNLy, anyone can download this entire database of keys, but who owns the car(s) associated with the keys...?
Nobody knows, except for one smart ass, he doesn't have any proof whatsoever but he just knows. Oh, and the fact that there's another type of unique production line of cars which we know was banned to own back in the 70's, causing everyone to sell them to the Rothschild family doesn't bother this smart ass, that's still a good store of value and investment.
Tell me, how much gold does the Rothschild family have in their massive vault? we've seen the vault and we can estimate the amount of gold in there but no exact numbers has ever been revealed. And what about cash or bank money, that's an even bigger joke if you truly are against surveillance and lack of control.
I had always thought bitcoin to be the new currency for globalists.
It wasn't started that way. There is a lot of history that people don't know about. The cabal took over the main BTC project around 2015. Before that it was managed by a core group of developers who wanted to use bitcoin to liberate the world from private central banks. There was infiltration to the highest levels of the crypto industry and they took over with social media influencers mockingbird style spreading lies and drama all over the internet. They divided and conquered.
Since they split bitcoin into multiple forks and crippled the base layer protocol they ensured it could never scale with user adoption. Its actually a completely artificial limitation that was only put in to prevent DDoS spam attacks when the network was very young. This is what the Cabal will not concede under any circumstances and what caused the initial rift in the crypto space. People were mysteriously switching sides after arguing for removing the limitation in the software that could allow for guaranteed cheap transactions for everyone in the world, to supporting the "store of value" narrative. Bitcoin was suddenly trendy to "hodl" but not cool to spend. It became an investment vehicle.
There are still people working on ways for crypto to challenge fiat and the NWO but they don't get much attention. Same kind of media blackout you see in politics.
True that. BCH FTW.
They would have no reason to reinvent the wheel, as they already own all the banks. If they wanted to have a massive pump and dump ponzi scheme they would have built something using their already centralized infrastructure, something like the stock market. But that too would have been a reinvention of the wheel.
It's pretty obvious that crypto is legit, just like it's predecessors created by libertarians and anti-bank folks, who got killed or arrested in the process. And if you look closely, you can see that they're treating it like precious metals, trying to associate it with tulips, buy in themselves and dump on the market to create volatility and stuff like that. All in pathetic attempts to scare people away.
The scaling debate and all the alt coins is yet another issue. Tho all that aside, I usually say that crypto is still the least terrible alternative in a cashless hell, where the only alternative would have been a bank. I've lost value, but I've also earned value simply because of holding, staking and mining.
Thay already own all the bitcoin as well....
Tell me what happens when you switch the world to a currency where 90% of it is wholly owned by 1% of the population?
You just made a new royal class.
Who do you think owns all the gold? it didn't just magically disappear back in the 70's when Americans where forced to sell all their gold.
You say they own all Bitcoin, prove it, here's the top 100 richest addresses, who are (((they))) on the list: https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html
Let me get thus straight.
A digital currency comes out. Supposedly created by some ghost figure named Satoshi. It is used as a transactional currency for human trafficking, drug trafficking, child porn, etc.
And you think a bunch of small investors are holding the lions share? 🤔
You don't think the cabal has been winning hand over fist with the pump and dumps? 🤔
You think that most people in the world have bitcoin and are ready to start using it?
Further that those who don't will be sharing it fees the economy?
Good luck with that!
No digital currency just "came out", what came out was the blueprints for a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, in combination with a piece of FOSS code to demonstrate the concept.
See this is like someone releasing 3D models for gun parts you can print in your own 3D printer. If you'd knew anything about guns you'd recognize the parts and could tell that they where legit. Yet still you're gonna have to deal with sheeples crying that those parts where released by the globalists... why would the globalists do that? They don't want you to have any freedom.
Same with cars, what stops you from building your own car from scratch, other than stupid government regulations and lack of required knowledge? And if you where to succeed on such project, does that mean your custom built car will be just as shitty as any mass produced shit car? of course not. The idea is just retarded.
Just throwing non pertinent t docs at the argument doesn't help your argument right?
So let's dumb this down.
Let's say a bunch of lfuel efficient cars were created. Early on about 1% of the human population got 90% of them. No more will ever be produced.
Now here is the quiz....
Who owns all the cars?
Who doesn't own the cars?
Do you think the 99% who don't own one of these fuel efficient cars would be willing to give up all current cars when their chances of getting one would be next to nil?
Ever heard of supply and demand?
Okay let's play your game then, each car and it's owner is listed on a public blockchain as a anonymous key, just like this one: 3J65t1WtEk25CNmQviecrnyiWadfRhWNLy, anyone can download this entire database of keys, but who owns the car(s) associated with the keys...?
Nobody knows, except for one smart ass, he doesn't have any proof whatsoever but he just knows. Oh, and the fact that there's another type of unique production line of cars which we know was banned to own back in the 70's, causing everyone to sell them to the Rothschild family doesn't bother this smart ass, that's still a good store of value and investment.
Tell me, how much gold does the Rothschild family have in their massive vault? we've seen the vault and we can estimate the amount of gold in there but no exact numbers has ever been revealed. And what about cash or bank money, that's an even bigger joke if you truly are against surveillance and lack of control.
Didn't Killary say it at a globohomo meeting recently???