A digital currency comes out. Supposedly created by some ghost figure named Satoshi. It is used as a transactional currency for human trafficking, drug trafficking, child porn, etc.
And you think a bunch of small investors are holding the lions share? 🤔
You don't think the cabal has been winning hand over fist with the pump and dumps? 🤔
You think that most people in the world have bitcoin and are ready to start using it?
Further that those who don't will be sharing it fees the economy?
No digital currency just "came out", what came out was the blueprints for a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, in combination with a piece of FOSS code to demonstrate the concept.
See this is like someone releasing 3D models for gun parts you can print in your own 3D printer. If you'd knew anything about guns you'd recognize the parts and could tell that they where legit. Yet still you're gonna have to deal with sheeples crying that those parts where released by the globalists... why would the globalists do that? They don't want you to have any freedom.
Same with cars, what stops you from building your own car from scratch, other than stupid government regulations and lack of required knowledge? And if you where to succeed on such project, does that mean your custom built car will be just as shitty as any mass produced shit car? of course not. The idea is just retarded.
Just throwing non pertinent t docs at the argument doesn't help your argument right?
So let's dumb this down.
Let's say a bunch of lfuel efficient cars were created. Early on about 1% of the human population got 90% of them. No more will ever be produced.
Now here is the quiz....
Who owns all the cars?
Who doesn't own the cars?
Do you think the 99% who don't own one of these fuel efficient cars would be willing to give up all current cars when their chances of getting one would be next to nil?
Okay let's play your game then, each car and it's owner is listed on a public blockchain as a anonymous key, just like this one: 3J65t1WtEk25CNmQviecrnyiWadfRhWNLy, anyone can download this entire database of keys, but who owns the car(s) associated with the keys...?
Nobody knows, except for one smart ass, he doesn't have any proof whatsoever but he just knows. Oh, and the fact that there's another type of unique production line of cars which we know was banned to own back in the 70's, causing everyone to sell them to the Rothschild family doesn't bother this smart ass, that's still a good store of value and investment.
Tell me, how much gold does the Rothschild family have in their massive vault? we've seen the vault and we can estimate the amount of gold in there but no exact numbers has ever been revealed. And what about cash or bank money, that's an even bigger joke if you truly are against surveillance and lack of control.
1% owns 90%. Right? You are arguing the value of block chain tech. That's not the argument. Never was.
The argument is if 1% already owns 90% of BTC then switching to a btc as the currency basically had transferred almost all liquid wealth to that 1% who already owns all the BTC correct?
Let me get thus straight.
A digital currency comes out. Supposedly created by some ghost figure named Satoshi. It is used as a transactional currency for human trafficking, drug trafficking, child porn, etc.
And you think a bunch of small investors are holding the lions share? 🤔
You don't think the cabal has been winning hand over fist with the pump and dumps? 🤔
You think that most people in the world have bitcoin and are ready to start using it?
Further that those who don't will be sharing it fees the economy?
Good luck with that!
No digital currency just "came out", what came out was the blueprints for a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, in combination with a piece of FOSS code to demonstrate the concept.
See this is like someone releasing 3D models for gun parts you can print in your own 3D printer. If you'd knew anything about guns you'd recognize the parts and could tell that they where legit. Yet still you're gonna have to deal with sheeples crying that those parts where released by the globalists... why would the globalists do that? They don't want you to have any freedom.
Same with cars, what stops you from building your own car from scratch, other than stupid government regulations and lack of required knowledge? And if you where to succeed on such project, does that mean your custom built car will be just as shitty as any mass produced shit car? of course not. The idea is just retarded.
Just throwing non pertinent t docs at the argument doesn't help your argument right?
So let's dumb this down.
Let's say a bunch of lfuel efficient cars were created. Early on about 1% of the human population got 90% of them. No more will ever be produced.
Now here is the quiz....
Who owns all the cars?
Who doesn't own the cars?
Do you think the 99% who don't own one of these fuel efficient cars would be willing to give up all current cars when their chances of getting one would be next to nil?
Ever heard of supply and demand?
Okay let's play your game then, each car and it's owner is listed on a public blockchain as a anonymous key, just like this one: 3J65t1WtEk25CNmQviecrnyiWadfRhWNLy, anyone can download this entire database of keys, but who owns the car(s) associated with the keys...?
Nobody knows, except for one smart ass, he doesn't have any proof whatsoever but he just knows. Oh, and the fact that there's another type of unique production line of cars which we know was banned to own back in the 70's, causing everyone to sell them to the Rothschild family doesn't bother this smart ass, that's still a good store of value and investment.
Tell me, how much gold does the Rothschild family have in their massive vault? we've seen the vault and we can estimate the amount of gold in there but no exact numbers has ever been revealed. And what about cash or bank money, that's an even bigger joke if you truly are against surveillance and lack of control.
You completely skipped the argument.
1% owns 90%. Right? You are arguing the value of block chain tech. That's not the argument. Never was.
The argument is if 1% already owns 90% of BTC then switching to a btc as the currency basically had transferred almost all liquid wealth to that 1% who already owns all the BTC correct?