I continue to ponder why those administering the vaccine are not required to "inform" recipients they are participating in a scientific experiment (study is ongoing) with an experimental mRNA gene therapy. I can only surmise this neglect to inform is related to "emergency use" protocols.
There are lots of things like that—how can they post notices on interstate freeways, “Masks Saves Lives” or billboards that say, “Covid 19 vaccine— Safe, Effective, Free.” when there is NO evidence for that. I mean, vitamin companies can’t say it’s product does something helpful unless it has gone through rigorous tests, so....?!?
Those details are in fact given in print to those getting the vaccine. It includes disclosing in writing that the vaccines aren't approved by the FDA if it isn't Pfizer, are only approved under EUA, lists possible side effects, and that the vaccine makers will not have any liability for the vaccine. The person getting the shot, or their guardian, sign this paper before they can get the shot.
The approved Pfizer version, Comirnaty, is not unavailable so vaccine recipients are still receiving the EUA version. Also, I imagine most people receiving the injection are unaware that the COVID 19 vaccine is not a traditional vaccine (no organic forms of the Coronvirus) and actually alters one's DNA via the mRNA process. This gene therapy has never been marketed in a vaccine previously and overall animals in the studies did not do well long-term. There are no data/safety sheets when someone gets the jab as are typically included with other vaccines and drugs. Also, it is my understanding that different people are receiving different formulas with different batches containing varying percentages of the lipid nanoparticles (Dr. Jane Ruby). These details should definitely be shared when parents have their children vaccinated.
That “war crimes” part will just make people roll their eyes.
I continue to ponder why those administering the vaccine are not required to "inform" recipients they are participating in a scientific experiment (study is ongoing) with an experimental mRNA gene therapy. I can only surmise this neglect to inform is related to "emergency use" protocols.
There are lots of things like that—how can they post notices on interstate freeways, “Masks Saves Lives” or billboards that say, “Covid 19 vaccine— Safe, Effective, Free.” when there is NO evidence for that. I mean, vitamin companies can’t say it’s product does something helpful unless it has gone through rigorous tests, so....?!?
Those details are in fact given in print to those getting the vaccine. It includes disclosing in writing that the vaccines aren't approved by the FDA if it isn't Pfizer, are only approved under EUA, lists possible side effects, and that the vaccine makers will not have any liability for the vaccine. The person getting the shot, or their guardian, sign this paper before they can get the shot.
The approved Pfizer version, Comirnaty, is not unavailable so vaccine recipients are still receiving the EUA version. Also, I imagine most people receiving the injection are unaware that the COVID 19 vaccine is not a traditional vaccine (no organic forms of the Coronvirus) and actually alters one's DNA via the mRNA process. This gene therapy has never been marketed in a vaccine previously and overall animals in the studies did not do well long-term. There are no data/safety sheets when someone gets the jab as are typically included with other vaccines and drugs. Also, it is my understanding that different people are receiving different formulas with different batches containing varying percentages of the lipid nanoparticles (Dr. Jane Ruby). These details should definitely be shared when parents have their children vaccinated.