The weather we have seen just hit four states; especially Kentucky, has me wondering if the war we are fighting includes top-secret, weaponized weather.
Or could it possibly have to do with current, NON-man-made, cycle our planet is going through, that has our planet's weather changing due to the temporary, weakening magnetic field, and the coming magnetic excursion?
Evidence please? Enlighten me. I only have 3 degrees in aeronautics and astronautics. I worked for a company that made jetliners and bombers. The entire idea is paranoid and fanciful. You guys always have a superior snooty attitude of having inside information, but you really don't have anything.
Every airliner is built openly in the presence of hundreds of technical personnel. There are no "chemtrail" systems. (Though I have seen a hoax video purporting to show the interior of a chemtrail spreading airplane...but they were only showing a Boeing developmental airplane and its hydraulic system for shifting the center of gravity forward and aft. You think you are getting the real skinny, but you are just getting gulled by people who know it is fake...because they are faking it.)
Start with some pics https://duckduckgo.com/?q=photo+of+interior+chemtrail+plane&atb=v133-1&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images And then check geoengineeringwatch.org. Dane Wigginton is a normal guy who started studying this years ago. He's legit in my book.
This is funny. You haven't even noticed the pictures that are part of debunking information. This isn't chemtrail stuff. It is a special hydraulic system for shifting the center of gravity longitudinally in an airplane, to facilitate obtaining flight stability data. This is at the Boeing company (where I worked). If you think this is evidence, you have been hoaxed by the nose. If you think this is the start of "chemtrails," you have picked the wrong horse.
" It is a special hydraulic system for shifting the center of gravity longitudinally in an airplane, to facilitate obtaining flight stability data." Sounds like BS to me. Why does their special hydraulic system use keg type containers to obtain flight stability data? What's in those containers? Sensitive equipment? Dane Wiggington's work is not fake. Contrails don't last all day and spread out over the sky, they dissipate almost immediately because of course they are water. Chemtrails are a mix of chemicals such as aluminum, strontium, barium, mercury, other heavy metals. Chemtrails come to the ground eventually, unlike contrails. I would think as a self professed rocket scientist you would already know these things. Sometimes higher levels of education are no more than higher levels of indoctrination. Here is another article that I doubt you will read but others on this forum might find it interesting. https://www.cancerwisdom.net/what-are-chemtrails/
Why keg-shaped containers? Maybe because that shape has been standard for conveying liquids on ships? Too expensive to have Coke-bottle shaped containers? What is in those containers, brighteyes, is WATER. It is pumped or displaced by pressure to known, calibrated locations along the length of the airplane. I don't know if Dane Wiggington is responsible for the photos (and the video I have seen), but if he is, he is a first-class con man.
Sure, contrails can last all day. They are nothing more than a cloud and clouds last all day (though the contrails eventually diffuse). They do NOT dissipate immediately. Why would they, when the atmospheric conditions bring them into being? The same conditions would tend to preserve them. Until they turn back into water vapor and vanish.
Chemtrails don't exist, so you are imagining what they might contain. (Just to anticipate your answer, patent applications with recipes are just wishful thinking. I have a patent with interesting recipes, too, and nothing is happening with it.) Lots of things come to the ground eventually, including up to 48.5 tons of meteor dust each day. As a self-professed rocket scientist, I think of things like that. What is the composition of meteors? Iron-nickel alloy, silicates, and trace heavy metals. Sounds strangely close to the "chemtrail" components.
The linked article is bullshit from the outset. "Contrails usually dissipate within seconds." Not a chance. "Turbojets and low-bypass turbofans are the only engines capable of producing contrails." Definitely not true behind allied bombers in World War II, where the film coverage has the contrails extending behind them for miles. Who says high-bypass turbofans can't produce contrails? (Contrails are all about the combustion of hydrocarbons to make water vapor that has a higher humidity in the exhaust gases than the ambient atmosphere.) The appearance of many contrails since 1990 correlates with the ability of passenger aircraft to fly at higher stratospheric altitudes, 40,000 feet and above. Then the article launches into sheer baseless assertion. Since this discussion starts out from a completely fallacious understanding of contrails, it is no wonder that it regards persistent contrails as something abnormal, when it is not at all. Building a case on conjecture is ass-backwards, when there is NO EVIDENCE.
Sometimes higher levels of education are exactly that. Being more educated, which means being able to point out falsehood and error.