As posted, he asked a woman here in a joking-not-joking way for nude photos.
If you had included this with the context of sexual harassment instead of the 14 year old as context, I wouldn't have misunderstood the context.
Context is important. Nevertheless, I'm not sure that's sexual harassment per se, though it is extremely rude and likely bannable. Which means there is an appropriate channel to take care of the problem.
And now I’m the one with the problem for my “personal attacks”?
You are making personal attacks. There can be no doubts about that. You are attacking that person with accusations of crimes (pedophilia) for which there is no evidence. What you are doing is wrong. These problems sort themselves out much better when you don't do things the way you are doing them. What you are doing IS libel:
Libel: the legally indefensible publication or broadcast of words or images that are degrading to a person or injurious to his or her reputation.
You have called someone a pedophile, despite no actual pedophile behavior or actions that you know of. That is exactly the definition of libel. Whether you like it or not, that's what it is. No matter how justified you feel your behavior is, I find it disgusting. There are many other ways of handling whatever problems you may have than being degrading and falsely accusing (or accusing without evidence) someone of a crime that there is no evidence they have committed.
Stop attacking people. Do what you feel is right through the proper channels. Calling people out for having a different opinion is not the right path. It helps no one, and only harms people and the greater debate.
They were TWO SEPARATE sentences, divided by question marks! Keep up! And I DID REPORT his comments! Why the fuck do you think I went to this public route to expose this pedophile? And yes, he is a pedophile! I will not apologize for using that term, I don’t care what label you put on it. Because I guarandamntee you if someone called ME a pedophile, I’d be crawling through the screen ripping their faces off their skulls, and yet he doubles down. I’m done with this. It’s almost like you’re making excuses for his behavior and that says a hell of a lot about YOU. Meh FREE SPEECH my ass.
It’s almost like you’re making excuses for his behavior
Except I have explicitly stated that I don't condone it and find it offensive. I am telling you I find your behavior offensive also. That is the contention. Don't put words into my mouth to justify your behavior, or my aversion to it.
So my publicly calling out this sick whack pedo is equally as offensive to GA as the actual sick whack pedo you’re protecting under the guise of “free speech”? I’ve seen your comments here, justifying minor age, etc. “Boo boo! You’re libeling our resident pedophile!” Here’s some free speech for ya: FUCK YOU
I am not "justifying" anything. I am attempting to explain the system. The Matrix is so much more complex than people want to believe. Everyone thinks they know the "truth". That they "have it figured out."
I don't. You don't. None of us do. That is why we are investigators. The Matrix has you. It has me. It has us all. It is a system that creates our belief systems to control us.
When I was talking about the history of age, I was trying to show part of The Matrix. I was trying to show the evidence of how our beliefs have changed substantially over just a few decades to be the opposite of what they were for the hundreds of thousands if not millions of years before those last few decades.
I was trying to give the evidence of this particular system of control of The Matrix.
Since "The Law" (which I insist are a creation of the Cabal, but whatever) is so important, here is the reality of our currentAge of Consent Laws. You will notice the overwhelming majority of states (32) have age of consent set at 16 or less (unless they are in a position of authority over you, like a teacher, or boss, etc.). It is only 18 states where the age of consent is 18.
All of those laws were changed within the past 100 years, most after 1920. They were far different before that. Most were changed to what they are now after they had put in The Fed and taken complete control of our government. The media and the school system (which they have completely controlled for over 150 years) were then used to instill "Taboo's", to ensure that such crimes were "the worst possible crimes ever." Notice I am not talking about having sex with children or predatory behavior. I am talking specifically about the reality of teenage (young adult, post childhood) sex.
We as a society believe that what was considered totally normal for a million years or so of human existence is now "the worst crime ever."
We know that they use exactly those "crimes" to control their "pieces on the board" (governors, judges, presidents, CEOs, etc.). How could they use such crimes to control all those people? First they need to make people believe that they are the worst crimes ever. If its just a "normal" crime, it can't be used as an effective tool for blackmail.
The world is run by exactly this blackmail, that they put in with their laws, and made us believe was the worst thing ever by their media.
In no way am I making an moral judgements here. I am not saying what is right or wrong. I am not "justifying" anything. I am only showing you the machinery that exists.
So my publicly calling out this sick whack pedo
You have provided zero evidence of pedophilia, yet you continue to call him a pedo. How can you not see that accusing someone of such a heinous crime without evidence is exactly what we are fighting against???
is equally as offensive to GA
I never made statements of equivocation. You just did. Don't put words into my mouth.
you’re protecting
What "protection" did I give to anyone?
I said that you are accusing someone of a heinous crime without evidence (true). That is an inappropriate action that causes harm (always true). THEIR actions are not relevant to YOUR harm causing action. If you can't take responsibility for your actions then you will simply continue with the behavior and more harm will be caused.
There are other ways of dealing with the situation than accusing someone of a heinous crime without evidence (or in such a public and libelous manner).
If you had included this with the context of sexual harassment instead of the 14 year old as context, I wouldn't have misunderstood the context.
Context is important. Nevertheless, I'm not sure that's sexual harassment per se, though it is extremely rude and likely bannable. Which means there is an appropriate channel to take care of the problem.
You are making personal attacks. There can be no doubts about that. You are attacking that person with accusations of crimes (pedophilia) for which there is no evidence. What you are doing is wrong. These problems sort themselves out much better when you don't do things the way you are doing them. What you are doing IS libel:
You have called someone a pedophile, despite no actual pedophile behavior or actions that you know of. That is exactly the definition of libel. Whether you like it or not, that's what it is. No matter how justified you feel your behavior is, I find it disgusting. There are many other ways of handling whatever problems you may have than being degrading and falsely accusing (or accusing without evidence) someone of a crime that there is no evidence they have committed.
Stop attacking people. Do what you feel is right through the proper channels. Calling people out for having a different opinion is not the right path. It helps no one, and only harms people and the greater debate.
They were TWO SEPARATE sentences, divided by question marks! Keep up! And I DID REPORT his comments! Why the fuck do you think I went to this public route to expose this pedophile? And yes, he is a pedophile! I will not apologize for using that term, I don’t care what label you put on it. Because I guarandamntee you if someone called ME a pedophile, I’d be crawling through the screen ripping their faces off their skulls, and yet he doubles down. I’m done with this. It’s almost like you’re making excuses for his behavior and that says a hell of a lot about YOU. Meh FREE SPEECH my ass.
Except I have explicitly stated that I don't condone it and find it offensive. I am telling you I find your behavior offensive also. That is the contention. Don't put words into my mouth to justify your behavior, or my aversion to it.
So my publicly calling out this sick whack pedo is equally as offensive to GA as the actual sick whack pedo you’re protecting under the guise of “free speech”? I’ve seen your comments here, justifying minor age, etc. “Boo boo! You’re libeling our resident pedophile!” Here’s some free speech for ya: FUCK YOU
I am not "justifying" anything. I am attempting to explain the system. The Matrix is so much more complex than people want to believe. Everyone thinks they know the "truth". That they "have it figured out."
I don't. You don't. None of us do. That is why we are investigators. The Matrix has you. It has me. It has us all. It is a system that creates our belief systems to control us.
When I was talking about the history of age, I was trying to show part of The Matrix. I was trying to show the evidence of how our beliefs have changed substantially over just a few decades to be the opposite of what they were for the hundreds of thousands if not millions of years before those last few decades.
I was trying to give the evidence of this particular system of control of The Matrix.
Since "The Law" (which I insist are a creation of the Cabal, but whatever) is so important, here is the reality of our current Age of Consent Laws. You will notice the overwhelming majority of states (32) have age of consent set at 16 or less (unless they are in a position of authority over you, like a teacher, or boss, etc.). It is only 18 states where the age of consent is 18.
All of those laws were changed within the past 100 years, most after 1920. They were far different before that. Most were changed to what they are now after they had put in The Fed and taken complete control of our government. The media and the school system (which they have completely controlled for over 150 years) were then used to instill "Taboo's", to ensure that such crimes were "the worst possible crimes ever." Notice I am not talking about having sex with children or predatory behavior. I am talking specifically about the reality of teenage (young adult, post childhood) sex.
We as a society believe that what was considered totally normal for a million years or so of human existence is now "the worst crime ever."
We know that they use exactly those "crimes" to control their "pieces on the board" (governors, judges, presidents, CEOs, etc.). How could they use such crimes to control all those people? First they need to make people believe that they are the worst crimes ever. If its just a "normal" crime, it can't be used as an effective tool for blackmail.
The world is run by exactly this blackmail, that they put in with their laws, and made us believe was the worst thing ever by their media.
In no way am I making an moral judgements here. I am not saying what is right or wrong. I am not "justifying" anything. I am only showing you the machinery that exists.
You have provided zero evidence of pedophilia, yet you continue to call him a pedo. How can you not see that accusing someone of such a heinous crime without evidence is exactly what we are fighting against???
I never made statements of equivocation. You just did. Don't put words into my mouth.
What "protection" did I give to anyone?
I said that you are accusing someone of a heinous crime without evidence (true). That is an inappropriate action that causes harm (always true). THEIR actions are not relevant to YOUR harm causing action. If you can't take responsibility for your actions then you will simply continue with the behavior and more harm will be caused.
There are other ways of dealing with the situation than accusing someone of a heinous crime without evidence (or in such a public and libelous manner).