Except the voting sure. No one "should" vote bc there is no need of a State. In a moral or principle sense. In a strategic sense as part of the class war against the globalists everyone who can vote should vote against global corporatism
Anyone with sexually mature organs, including seventh graders and younger, qualifies as being competent enough to drive a one and a half ton vehicle through Middleton to Philadelphia traffic? BTW, anarchy means the absence of a state, not the absence of the individual vote.
Iran is the ideal model to you, is it? Lol you're really making a case for yourself...
Just because there is an absence of a governing body does not mean that the people's needs, wants and goals suddenly vanish. If anything, adopting an anarchist society means that the people have a more direct effect on what happens within their immediate communities than ever before. If we ended our government tomorrow, what do you think would happen to everyone? We would all start killing and stealing from each other? Probably in the inter cities and other crime ridden places, but it's logical to assume most of America would form their own close-knit communities for purposes of safety and to increase survivability. Organizations individuals have entered voluntarily resemble churches, families, and tribes. From these examples of self-governing groups, we can infer that voting or casting an opinion on a matter would be used extensively.
Except the voting sure. No one "should" vote bc there is no need of a State. In a moral or principle sense. In a strategic sense as part of the class war against the globalists everyone who can vote should vote against global corporatism
Anyone with sexually mature organs, including seventh graders and younger, qualifies as being competent enough to drive a one and a half ton vehicle through Middleton to Philadelphia traffic? BTW, anarchy means the absence of a state, not the absence of the individual vote.
I know for a fact that in Iran 12 year olds do that kinda stuff. 10 even.
Obviously we are talking about voting for govt officials. Did you mean "family vote for which restaurant?"
Iran is the ideal model to you, is it? Lol you're really making a case for yourself...
Just because there is an absence of a governing body does not mean that the people's needs, wants and goals suddenly vanish. If anything, adopting an anarchist society means that the people have a more direct effect on what happens within their immediate communities than ever before. If we ended our government tomorrow, what do you think would happen to everyone? We would all start killing and stealing from each other? Probably in the inter cities and other crime ridden places, but it's logical to assume most of America would form their own close-knit communities for purposes of safety and to increase survivability. Organizations individuals have entered voluntarily resemble churches, families, and tribes. From these examples of self-governing groups, we can infer that voting or casting an opinion on a matter would be used extensively.