1
pearlrevolver 1 point ago +1 / -0

In So-cal, "green" wood will burn because the fires often get very intense. I know from first hand experience in the 2007 wildfires. My home was burned, the jewelry in the bedroom melted, our truck's scorched frame was the only part that remained of it, and yes trees, scrub oaks mostly for the area, charred up and never came back.

But our shed, 200ft from our house survived with all of our junk in tact. I know the Santa Ana winds cause fires to quickly blow through an area. Sometimes patches of area are left unburned.

2
pearlrevolver 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the other 22% are probably from the offspring of migrants who were born in Germany over the last 30+ years.

5
pearlrevolver 5 points ago +5 / -0

That reminds me of our town's fire department. They blocked off our dirt road and let everyone in the area's houses burn, while the nearby Indian reservation's fire crew actually tried their damndest to help us and managed to save a few of our neighbor's homes. That was in 2007.

4
pearlrevolver 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. He's trying to save what's left of western civilization.

1
pearlrevolver 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of fires start from downed power lines. High winds knock them down and since Cali never clears any brush, it all lights up quick.

4
pearlrevolver 4 points ago +4 / -0

She is the product of multiple generations of living under a welfare state. You and I have to be able to hold a job or keep a spouse who has a job and that requires us to be somewhat likeable and have respect for social norms. Her and her ilk make money no matter how they behave. End the welfare state and these degenerates will have to try to conform to the standards of society in order to survive.

5
pearlrevolver 5 points ago +5 / -0

Let's be real, she's probably never paid taxes a day in her life.

4
pearlrevolver 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah no sh*t publicly micturating isn't as bad as murdering millions, but it's still disgusting and should not be tolerated. What we can't have standards now?

1
pearlrevolver 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do you define something as being a 'problem'? By its consequences. No one forced Muslims to rape 250,000 British girls over the last 24 years.

https://x.com/HappyCamper2626/status/1875933604456579455

We need the public outraged. With that comes change. Live up to that awesome username and recognize the Muslim scourge for what it is. There's no shame in stating that Muslim culture is antithetical to Christianized Western civilization. The biggest proponents of open borders or at least those who were tolerant of it, may have their minds completely changed by these hard to swallow red pills X is blowing up with.

2
pearlrevolver 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a teacher shortage because most people don't want to get paid to brainwash kids with woke propaganda.

3
pearlrevolver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not true. The Amish have their own doctors. My parents and husband have been to one. They don't take insurance and they are extremely affordable. Also, where is your evidence that they have a lot of retarded children? I live next to a huge Amish/Mennonite community and I have never seen one.

4
pearlrevolver 4 points ago +4 / -0

That woman is showing more foot than face. She best be careful otherwise a non-Mahran may see and have a sexual emergency with the closest animal.

2
pearlrevolver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't know if true, but I hear cuck porn is the most viewed kind in the UK.

1
pearlrevolver 1 point ago +1 / -0

That abomination is an insult to males.

2
pearlrevolver 2 points ago +2 / -0

To resort to such methods, one must lack basic empathy for others and have a self-loathing for one's own DNA. It is antithetical to the human species to end the life of one's own offspring time and time again. It seems Blacks typically have little empathy for their own kind as they are the biggest perpetrators of violence against their own race. They also have the highest rates of corporal punishment. Blacks beating on their children hasn't done a thing to curb criminal behavior, but it may be the key element in creating a tide of sociopaths that in turn have no problem ending their own unborn children's lives.

1
pearlrevolver 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not defending genocide, I'm arguing with your definition of immigrant. If the Europeans wanted to join up with the Natives, then the word immigrant would be appropriate. Instead of trying to change its definition, why don't you use words like 'invader' or 'intruder'? The original pilgrims were not immigrants. They did not want to assimilate and integrate with the native population.

2
pearlrevolver 2 points ago +2 / -0

immigrant: a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country.

The first European pilgrims came over in the 1400's and could not have been immigrants because America was not a country until 1776. They did not come to join up with the Native tribes living here. They came over and created their own towns. Sure, they traded with the Natives and learned about the land and crops from them, but that did not mean they were immigrants to the Natives tribes.

2
pearlrevolver 2 points ago +2 / -0

All the whites in America were immigrants.

What about the whites who have been in this country from before its founding?

2
pearlrevolver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Simple. There is no financial incentive to.

view more: Next ›