Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

219
Nearly 100% of people 55 and older in Scotland are “fully vaccinated”. Despite this fact, Scotland has seen a significant surge in deaths for all age groups over 55. Is another jab really going to fix this or are we looking at the wrong culprit? (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 4 years ago by MarleyGoat 4 years ago by MarleyGoat +219 / -0
16 comments download share
16 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (16)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– SirRupert 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Can all the Worldly scientists hold hands and simultaneously say that this road we are on is a one way street the wrong way.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Three_on_the_Tree 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

no, they would be executed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SirRupert 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

By electrocution, I should think if they don't spark an interest in salvation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– cyberrigger 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

BURN MORE WITCHES ! ! !

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SirRupert 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Any new ideas are always welcome at an impasse.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– cyberrigger 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Mass Formation Psychosis

https://www.bitchute.com/video/0WeZPmqEdNkJ/

When there is a perceived crisis without a clear solution

people are more likely to accept a wrong solution.

This was the case of burning witches.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SirRupert 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I'm confident the remedy will not be such a hot topic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MarleyGoat [S] 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

People over the age of 55 in Scotland saw a surge in deaths from all causes from 24 to 30 weeks after most people in the age group received their 2nd jab. This surge in deaths peaked at over 25% higher than the 5-year average (2014-2019) for every age group in this study.

Health authorities around the world are reacting to this surge by promoting a 3rd jab. Currently over 50% of people older than 55 in Scotland have already received a “booster”. But what if the cause of this surge in deaths is the vaccine itself?

As you can see from the graphs, there is a dip in deaths at the same time people are receiving their 2nd jab. Are we becoming addicted to a shot that produces a short-term benefit followed by long term harm? Is the short-term benefit going to wane? Will future boosters “wear off” sooner and sooner? Does this remind you of any other drugs? Who is the “pusher” this time?

Source for covid Vax Data: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/phs.covid.19/viz/COVID-19DailyDashboard_15960160643010/Overview

Source for all cause deaths in Scotland: https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/vital-events/general-publications/weekly-and-monthly-data-on-births-and-deaths/deaths-involving-coronavirus-covid-19-in-scotland/related-statistics

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– spkle 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

OK - just to make this a bit better:

  1. Percent fully vaxxed should be cumulative or renamed and a cumulative dotted line added. I understand you want to show the inflection point.
  2. It would be very interesting to see a significance attached to this 25-ish week period it's unfortunate we don't have case-tracked data, otherwise I'd use a Weibull, not sure if this dataset could rule out a coincidence entirely (It could be that the certainty interval is too high)
  3. The 55-59 is strange. I wonder why. Have you looked at younger people as well? Early reactions more prominent? How about Jab 1?
permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MarleyGoat [S] 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Thank you for the questions!

  1. You are correct--I wanted to indicate the week that had the most jabs for each age group. I will add a cumulative line for future graphs if it doesn't clutter the chart too much. Any thoughts on a better name for my current vax line?

  2. Fauci and crew have been warning of decreased vaccine efficacy over time as an argument for boosters after 6 months. Whatever the cause, the rise in mortality is significant. I have looked at other age groups in Scotland, and may report in the future as more data is posted. The increase in deaths after 2nd jab in Scotland was similar to a trend I found earlier in the US and reported here: https://patriots.win/p/140c9TQsCO/americans-aged-6574-are-dying-ap/c/

  3. 55-60 is different from the others and I don't have a guess as to why. In both the US and Scotland the 2nd jab is closest to the valley in excess deaths. In fact most of this decrease in excess deaths happens before the 1st jab in both countries. I reported on 50-54 age group here: https://greatawakening.win/p/140cWvvhHd/over-94-of-people-5054-in-scotla/c/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– spkle 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
  1. Vaccination Rate / time interval (1st derivative of the cumulative - time unit would be the time data's resolution)
  2. There's a different response in age groups - see next point
  3. I did an analysis in July looking for the efficacy for the vaccines in the UK (they've been relatively open and clear with their data). There's an inverse relationship between efficacy and age / time since vaccination (these variables are hard to separate in this dataset). At the time, the vaccine seemed to yield a ~20% reduction in hospitalizations and ~30% in death for people under 50. But ... for those above, it was the opposite. 20% more deaths and hospitalizations for vaccinated. The evolution was almost linear.

Keep in mind that the data I used came from different sources and in every case of inaccurate data or uncertainty I implemented a positive bias for the vaccine. So, realistically, results would be worse.

At the time, I attributed that to age. Now ... I'm starting to think it's time since vaccine (first dose in my case).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MarleyGoat [S] 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I agree that the UK has been pretty open with their data. With that said, I'm skeptical of any data that requires a decision to be made by a caregiver. Did the person die from pneumonia, organ failure or covid? In the US, hospitals have been complaining that their ICUs are full of unvaccinated covid patients but often, nurses that have actually asked patients in those same hospitals if they were vaxed tell a different story. This is why "death from all causes" is such a valuable data point and Scotland with such a high rate of vaccination is such a valuable resource to track. By the way, Scotland's datasets are excellent! Other countries would benefit by following Scotland's lead on reporting vital statistics!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lapstrake 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Hmm. Well maybe lockdowns, social distancing and double masks and double boosters will fix it.

Maybe if we keep doing all the things that didn't work even more, then it will work and we can all go back to normal.

C'mon normies. Figure this shit out. I think they are finally getting it, but it is so slow.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– bigtimepie 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

See the interview with an immunologist here, starts about 18min in: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2quFCmxqeQDhPNzi7NEMMj?si=drF1tZOpQN-emmdvzRwIvw&context=spotify%3Ashow%3A2tpVFTPGVhO73BRYZ0Y6zP

TLDR: The vaccines give a short term benefit against the virus followed long term weakening of the immune system against this virus as well as others.

If I remember correctly, he says that this happens because this "vax" trains the body to create an unnatural antibody response. Naturally, the body would create less antibody-producing b-cells and instead more virus-killing t-cells.

Lots of side effects from this like taking longer for the body to kill the virus, thus creating vaccinated super spreaders and potentially creating/spreading new variants from the vaccinated, inability to fight against new variants. Even worse, if the body creates the wrong types of antibodies then the body will trigger allergenic responses to them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Death_Metal_Patriot 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Commenting to bookmark this thread.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Three_on_the_Tree 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

White European peoples are going to be wiped out by this depop vax.

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy