1. Vaccination Rate / time interval (1st derivative of the cumulative - time unit would be the time data's resolution)
2. There's a different response in age groups - see next point
3. I did an analysis in July looking for the efficacy for the vaccines in the UK (they've been relatively open and clear with their data). There's an inverse relationship between efficacy and age / time since vaccination (these variables are hard to separate in this dataset). At the time, the vaccine seemed to yield a ~20% reduction in hospitalizations and ~30% in death for people under 50. But ... for those above, it was the opposite. 20% more deaths and hospitalizations for vaccinated. The evolution was almost linear.

Keep in mind that the data I used came from different sources and in every case of inaccurate data or uncertainty I implemented a positive bias for the vaccine. So, realistically, results would be worse.

At the time, I attributed that to age. Now ... I'm starting to think it's time since vaccine (first dose in my case).

OK - just to make this a bit better:

1. Percent fully vaxxed should be cumulative or renamed and a cumulative dotted line added. I understand you want to show the inflection point.
2. It would be very interesting to see a significance attached to this 25-ish week period it's unfortunate we don't have case-tracked data, otherwise I'd use a Weibull, not sure if this dataset could rule out a coincidence entirely (It could be that the certainty interval is too high)
3. The 55-59 is strange. I wonder why. Have you looked at younger people as well? Early reactions more prominent? How about Jab 1?

Look into why cancers grow. Apparently cancer cannot grow when your body is in keto mode.

Combine that with chemo and there's a chance. Look into it, please.

Hey man, what do you do? I know some interesting people in that space.

I heard they were about to finish the last building in Wakanda this year. You wouldn't know though, it's cloaked.

So much this. More often than not, i catch myself looking at a bombshell, only to go: oh i already knew that

But others don't. And that's the point.

PV is awesome and if they help reach people, I'm good.

At the very least, this will just be extra evidence for me to use.

As I said: Treason.

I'm willing to bet a good number of people at the top have sold out to the enemy.

This is a silent takeover, no shots fired. But it is evident that traitors have taken control.

The key to making all of this unravel is the link to foreign interference, even foreign aggression.

If you can say that both the CDC and Facebook are influenced by China, you have a very compelling reason to take extreme actions for the sake of the sovereignty of the US and the safety of its citizens.

China is the key.

It ties everything together. Reveal China, and suddenly everything becomes clear.

That is why demonization of the CCP is crucial.

Step 1: Make the CCP evil and a way for political idiots to easily assign guilt to it Step 2: Link the current problems to the CCP Step 3: Take harsh actions against traitors

This IS a case of treason.

The problem is that political idiots are not getting the truth or ignoring it because it is inconvenient.

Akula... You're a genius.

4 it is.

No, TRIPLE MASKS!!!!

So few people get this. OORAH, my friend!

No you heard:

• Peaceful transition-ta military power.

the ta is dialectic.

The alternative would have been:

• Peaceful transition-a military power.

where the "n" blends in with a soft transition. BUT the -a is not commonly used in this phrase construction.

It resembles the "ta" more. But he's also wearing a mask.

It's also WIERD to reference the transition of power as "military" power.

I know because of my interests

That is what a column is indeed.