On this website graphene went from a mind control nanobot shield to micro ninja swords in like two weeks with zero evidence of either. I haven't seen any real evidence that Graphene is even in the vaxx.
Also, wouldn't cutting the heart up cause more blood to flow, how would it be clotting if it was constantly cutting. Also, how does the substance find the heart and decide that is what it wants to cut?
Also, wouldn't cutting the heart up cause more blood to flow, how would it be clotting if it was constantly cutting. Also, how does the substance find the heart and decide that is what it wants to cut?
To bolster CQVFEFE's statement, the graphene compound flows in the bloodstream, lightly cutting as it goes; an athelete whose heart is pumping at max rate turns the graphene into a 'sandblaster' effect and shreds the valves. clotting is a whole 'nother piece of the jab puzzle. It is believed that when the jab hits a vein, it goes into effect as fast as the patient can collapse.
Except there is no real evidence there is even graphene in the vaxx. It's not listed as an ingredient and no one has shown it's in there, it's just something people were saying.
Fewer pillows and moar research-not just articles that bolster your agendas. Look on here, GAW, for articles that have collated athelete deaths, not MSM sources. Of course you don't hear much about the many kinds of vaxx death because VAERS is underreported by a factor of 29.
On this website graphene went from a mind control nanobot shield to micro ninja swords in like two weeks with zero evidence of either. I haven't seen any real evidence that Graphene is even in the vaxx.
Also, wouldn't cutting the heart up cause more blood to flow, how would it be clotting if it was constantly cutting. Also, how does the substance find the heart and decide that is what it wants to cut?
Congratulations
We Have A Winner
Dumbest Comment of the Year 2021
It's pretty cool I triggered you so much you're going through my comment history and being rude. Way to handshake.
To bolster CQVFEFE's statement, the graphene compound flows in the bloodstream, lightly cutting as it goes; an athelete whose heart is pumping at max rate turns the graphene into a 'sandblaster' effect and shreds the valves. clotting is a whole 'nother piece of the jab puzzle. It is believed that when the jab hits a vein, it goes into effect as fast as the patient can collapse.
Except there is no real evidence there is even graphene in the vaxx. It's not listed as an ingredient and no one has shown it's in there, it's just something people were saying.
Also, what about runners, mountain bikers, crossfitters? Why aren't we hearing about them dropping dead?
If it acts as a sword effect cutting as it goes, why doesn't it cut the vein walls and why aren't we seeing massive internal bleeding?
This would function similar to sickle cell if that's what you think it happening and we just aren't seeing those reactions.
Fewer pillows and moar research-not just articles that bolster your agendas. Look on here, GAW, for articles that have collated athelete deaths, not MSM sources. Of course you don't hear much about the many kinds of vaxx death because VAERS is underreported by a factor of 29.
No agencies use VAERS as a way to track data