“Most of these theories and so-called proofs read to me like a pedophile’s fantasy… At best this was all a foreign disinformation campaign.”

That’s as far as he goes in evaluating evidence and analyzing the facts, so his conclusion is unfounded. He completely fails to take a “so-called proof” and disprove it. Most of the proofs aren’t even about pedophilia, they’re just about validating the existence of Q and his connections to insiders like Trump. For this redditor to think the proofs are “like a pedophile’s fantasy” shows that he doesn’t even know the proofs. For example, what does “tippy top” have to do with pedos?