Evidence is only accepted in court when a WITNESS testifies under oath, subject to cross examination, regarding that evidence. Without that, it is NOT evidence.
If the court has no evidence from Party A, but does have evidence from Party B, then Party B wins.
The fact that the DOJ attorney said something because there was no FDA witness means NOTHING. Attorneys do not testify, and their words are not evidence or testimony.
Evidence is only accepted in court when a WITNESS testifies under oath, subject to cross examination, regarding that evidence. Without that, it is NOT evidence.
If the court has no evidence from Party A, but does have evidence from Party B, then Party B wins.
The fact that the DOJ attorney said something because there was no FDA witness means NOTHING. Attorneys do not testify, and their words are not evidence or testimony.
Will the judge follow the law, or break the law?