I'm a crypto investor. I was quite concerned when Trump came out and said Bitcoin is a scam. It very well might be controlled by deep state as I know Jack is all in on this project.
The fact that Melania is going in on NFT's tells me a lot about the position of Trump. Maybe not BTC, but it means that he isn't against cryptocurrencies in general. Blockchain will be a huge part of the future, much like internet. Highly risky, but that's what I like.
Not sure about the details, like Trump agreeing with Cryptocurrencies being actual currency, but it does say a lot about where they stand on it. The only conclusion I have is that they are in agreement that it will be an important part of future, which as an investor, is highly encouraging.
Significant difference between blockchain and cryptocurrency. Crypto uses blockchain, but blockchain exists independently of crypto as a decentralized and secure, crowd-audited, accountability structure.
For me the most interesting part is that she's linking physical assets to the NFTs. Essentially taking a pioneering step on the provenance of physical goods. Any investment-grade wine counterfeiters (I always found humor reading about those 40K bottles that nobody audits/drinks) should take notice, as well as art counterfeiters and a host of other fakers out there.
I wonder if this might lead to asset-backed cryptocurrency, but I think it's only a half-step in that direction. But it's interesting.
I'm excited about blockchain long-term, but leery of crypto as currency, and this article summarizes the reasons: a few unregulated pricy exchanges that corrupt the market. https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-07-decoded-the-globalist-plan-to-destroy-bitcoin-and-the-defi-crypto-ecosystem.html
Yup