THE MONEY MASTERS - the most comprehensive and detailed history, from Roman times to the present, of who is responsible.
(www.youtube.com)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Under the Constitution, habeas corpus may be suspended during an insurrection/rebellion, which is what was going on from November 1860 to 1865. Many insurrectionists and those aiding the rebellion were arrested, yes. All with cause. All legal. The vast majority were actually arrested by lower level political and military officials. It's not like Lincoln personally handpicked everyone to be arrested.
What happened in 1860-1865 was organized mass insurrection and rebellion. Sorry but the Calhunion theory of unilateral withdrawal from the Union is a fairy tale. There was and is no Constitutional "right" of "secession"... there's always a natural right to revolution, but the rebels never made that claim because none of their natural rights were being violated. Their only claim would have been right to property in slaves or profit of slave labor, which itself would be theft and thus, not a natural right at all.
Sorry fren, but these arguments are quite weak. It's ok to admit you were conned into believing Lost Cause propaganda.
Yes, the bankers wanted war. They exploited the #1 politically divisive issue of the entire existence of the USA up to that point: slavery. They tugged at those strings the same way racial and culture wars are tugged at today. They terrified slaveowners and even nonslaveowning southern whites, convincing them that Lincoln and the Republicans were going to end slavery and destroy their race based caste system. While it was true most Republicans personally detested slavery and vowed to eventually bring about abolition, their platform only called for the restriction of slavery to where it already existed and ban it from expanding westward/southward. But the fireeater propaganda machine, spurred by the bankers, sent them into a frenzy after they failed to keep Lincoln from winning (10 states illegally keeping Republican Electors off the ballot). Even before he was innaguated, deep south psychopath, sore loser slavers, the controlled and connected elite puppets, duped enough pawns with their fearmongering to convince them to engage in insurrection and rebellion.
Slavery was the cause of conflict, exploited by the bankers to further their agenda to divide the USA and bring it back under their control. Lincoln defeated them, and he was murdered for his heroism, just like subsequent presidents who stood in their way. Yes, the cabal would eventually get back control, but at least Lincoln delayed that for at least two decades, really even until 1913... had he not been murdered, perhaps they would have never been able to take back control. Bismark and Nicholas knew.
tldr; as was stated in the video above, Lincoln was a hero for challenging the money powers efforts to destroy the USA.
It'd have to get unanimous approval from the rest of the federated parties, so every other state. Or it'd have to successfully rebel.
Majority to get in? The original 13 states all unanimously bound themselves together into the very first compact under the Articles of Confederation. Arguably, the "American Union" was established earlier than that while still colonies under the Articles of Association 1774, the first act of the Continental Congress. All of the states approved the Articles of Confederation. Needed 9 of 13 states (2/3 majority) to ratify the change in form of government from the Articles to the Constitution, and all eventually ratified. Again, unanimous.
The first governing laws of the newly created United States of America were the Articles of Confederation and PERPETUAL Union. The intent was clear that the nation was to remain indivisible, permanently one country. The Constitution did not change the nature of the nation, only the form and operation of its federal government. Simply put, there were no terms for "leaving" because there was never to be any leaving. The Founders assumed that the states would check and nullify the federal government if and when it would be necessary, but never to just flat out say "we're leaving!" New England states threatened it early on during the war of 1812 and southern, Virginia led states laughed at such a notion (even Madison and Jefferson decried the claim of "secession"). How ironic that the southern slave states would make the same argument a few decades later after they lost power.