We listen to X22 everyday. He also has some great special guests in separate podcast interviews. Consider how the information presented is corroborated by other sources. Is there specific information that you question/doubt? More often than not, the topics Dave discusses I have already heard/seen on alternative MSM sites, Telegram, Rumble podcasts, etc. The cadence and phraseology are seemingly his presentation style. Likely, most of us would develop a style if we produced a solo daily podcast. The sponsor announcements are spliced in at various junctures. Finally, I encourage you to take the information you are hearing and "check it" against other sources as well as do a self check.
I've noticed that as well, but I think there is a reasonable explanation. He definitely likes to throw in popular q phrases here and there, and his commercials are obviously spliced in indiscriminately. He has had several years to cement his style as a podcaster and at this point I think he just is fully in the zone and sounds super rehearsed. I also wouldn't be surprised if he stealth edits his episodes at times, like if he fumbles a line or something, or perhaps he has a filter that automatically removes dead air or awkwardly long pauses. The show isn't live and modern tools make that sort of editing really easy.
Even if it is edited, it is probably his way to avoid legal issues. Adding “I believe” before a factual statement completely protects him. He has the right to believe anything he wants, and if his “belief” enlightens my feeble mind, I love him for it.
Funny you say that. I’ve noticed for a while the cadence used is intentional, almost hypnotic. I’ve followed x22 for literally years. I’ve questioned if it isn’t a larp meant to keep the “conspiracy theorists” preoccupied.
Sunday’s episode (politics not finance) was weird. I don’t play it at 1.5 speed but it sounded like it was playing faster than normal speed. No pause for breath. I think he edits heavily normally. He’ll talk about a topic and then take a break. Then talk about a different topic and take a break, splicing the sections together. Commercials are timed specifically, so doesn’t matter what he’s saying—that’s when they happen. The Spotlights appear more naturally flowing but could be edited, too, in a similar way.
I'll keep listening to him. My BS radar was piqued, but I guess it could be the use of a noise gate too.
You guys that 1.5x it are pretty hard core, 😄 you guys might like that Micro Machines Guy's podcast, he covers a whole 2 hours worth of material in a 4 minute show, I have no Idea what it about tho
I disagree, I think its the way Dave likes to point out things for you to consider. I could be wrong though, but I doubt that in this case.
We listen to X22 everyday. He also has some great special guests in separate podcast interviews. Consider how the information presented is corroborated by other sources. Is there specific information that you question/doubt? More often than not, the topics Dave discusses I have already heard/seen on alternative MSM sites, Telegram, Rumble podcasts, etc. The cadence and phraseology are seemingly his presentation style. Likely, most of us would develop a style if we produced a solo daily podcast. The sponsor announcements are spliced in at various junctures. Finally, I encourage you to take the information you are hearing and "check it" against other sources as well as do a self check.
I've noticed that as well, but I think there is a reasonable explanation. He definitely likes to throw in popular q phrases here and there, and his commercials are obviously spliced in indiscriminately. He has had several years to cement his style as a podcaster and at this point I think he just is fully in the zone and sounds super rehearsed. I also wouldn't be surprised if he stealth edits his episodes at times, like if he fumbles a line or something, or perhaps he has a filter that automatically removes dead air or awkwardly long pauses. The show isn't live and modern tools make that sort of editing really easy.
Even if it is edited, it is probably his way to avoid legal issues. Adding “I believe” before a factual statement completely protects him. He has the right to believe anything he wants, and if his “belief” enlightens my feeble mind, I love him for it.
Funny you say that. I’ve noticed for a while the cadence used is intentional, almost hypnotic. I’ve followed x22 for literally years. I’ve questioned if it isn’t a larp meant to keep the “conspiracy theorists” preoccupied.
That's what I'm feeling like. I read the term for that repetitive word use somewhere once, I wish I could remember it.
Speaking of Hopium. I think the Realism market might cut into iof tje action.
Sunday’s episode (politics not finance) was weird. I don’t play it at 1.5 speed but it sounded like it was playing faster than normal speed. No pause for breath. I think he edits heavily normally. He’ll talk about a topic and then take a break. Then talk about a different topic and take a break, splicing the sections together. Commercials are timed specifically, so doesn’t matter what he’s saying—that’s when they happen. The Spotlights appear more naturally flowing but could be edited, too, in a similar way.
I'll keep listening to him. My BS radar was piqued, but I guess it could be the use of a noise gate too.
You guys that 1.5x it are pretty hard core, 😄 you guys might like that Micro Machines Guy's podcast, he covers a whole 2 hours worth of material in a 4 minute show, I have no Idea what it about tho
😏
Bernie from Truth & Art TV interview on 12/9/2021 with Dave at X22. https://www.bitchute.com/video/ICugPAaRDgEC/
Dave gives his background info.
like "lets talk about your health", or something else?
No I understand those are the commercials
Okay, would love a clue for what to listen for :)
Oh! These: *Think about that for a second *Doesnt that tell you everything you need to know *Now whats very interesting *I do believe so
I usually listen on 1.5 speed LOL
I think it's weird Alex Jones never discusses him.
Compitition
I edited the punctuation, hopefully that'll read more accurately?