UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds "..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others"
(celiafarber.substack.com)
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
One of the conditions for EUA is consistency of product. Covid vaccines show 10 times more variation than flu vaccines.
And we all know how effective the flu vaccines are.
You don't know anything about the consistency of the product from the VAERS data. The VAERS data is useful to be aware if something adverse is occurring, it does not contain the information required to determine if the product is consistent or not.
They correlated adverse reactions with batch numbers and found them to be inconsistent. Only an issue because Pfizer claims consistency across all batches.
Let me make this simple:
Say batch A has 100 adverse reactions reported. Say batch B has 1000 adverse reactions reported.
From this, they are concluding that batch B is 10 times deadlier.
However, if batch A had 100,000 doses injected, and batch B had 1,000,000 doses injected, then for both batches, the adverse reaction reporting rate is 1/1000. It doesn't change just because B had more reported.
The VAERS data doesn't tell you how many were injected. It doesn't tell you how they were distributed. It doesn't tell you many key pieces of data that are required to determine if one batch is deadlier than another.
Maybe the batches are mostly consistent. Maybe they aren't. Either way, VAERS doesn't provide the necessary information to make such a determination. All these articles trying to generate these sorts of statistics from the VAERS data don't know what they're doing.
There's also correlation with addresses.
I think 2 pieces of research are being conflated. This study compares covid vaccine batches with flu vaccine batches
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/16/how-bad-is-my-covid-19-vaccine-batch/
and the other is US correlating address, batch and adverse reaction. It has 10% in the title.