Better.com might have been upset to find out they were suddenly liable for 60 days pay for 900 employees. How poorly could they have been doing that this was economically more favorable than letting them go slowly?
It sounds like those people were shit employees. If I was hemorrhaging payroll, due to a bunch of losers who want to earn maximum income for minimum effort, I’d fire all those shit bags at once too. I don’t know the whole situation but that’s my take.
They may well have deserved firing--sounds like the other execs were not too much against it. I was referring to the end of the article that had some facts about severance pay required in mass firings. He got rid of them but put the company on the hook for a lot more money than if he had handled it differently. Maybe That's why he's on leave now, not because he's a Scrooge.
Better.com might have been upset to find out they were suddenly liable for 60 days pay for 900 employees. How poorly could they have been doing that this was economically more favorable than letting them go slowly?
It sounds like those people were shit employees. If I was hemorrhaging payroll, due to a bunch of losers who want to earn maximum income for minimum effort, I’d fire all those shit bags at once too. I don’t know the whole situation but that’s my take.
They may well have deserved firing--sounds like the other execs were not too much against it. I was referring to the end of the article that had some facts about severance pay required in mass firings. He got rid of them but put the company on the hook for a lot more money than if he had handled it differently. Maybe That's why he's on leave now, not because he's a Scrooge.