You seem very knowledgeable about all this. Although these new pills are perhaps meant to keep people from using Ivermectin, or are at least suppose to be an alternative to it, I am glad to have my tested but off-label Ivermectin. Part of my 'treatment plan' also included the antibody infusion which they are also saying now does now work for the 'new' variant and so they are not using two of the kinds that were available and claiming there is a shortage of the third type of antibody that supposedly does work on the new variant. Is this a ploy to take away a working, albeit EUA drug treatment in order to try and force the vax? Losing this as part of my 'treatment plan' has me distressed, as I am at very high risk. OR, as a EUA infusion treatment, perhaps it wasn't a good part of my plan? Any thoughts? TY
The jabs. as well as the monoclonal antibody therapy, were developed based upon the original genetic sequencing of the alpha and beta strains that came from computer modeling. RNA viruses like SARS and Influenza mutate very quickly. This is why vaxxines and the like are limited in their usefulness over time. Therefore, there is no way to vaxxinate a way out of the cycle of infection for these types of respiratory illnesses. Frankly, much of what we are seeing that is labeled as a variant in reality is partially a coverup for vaxxine injury and ADE infections.
Like Influenza shots, the effectiveness against whatever the declared flavors of the year are that are decided several years in advance, are almost useless due to constant antigenic drift that creates new variants. In addition, a shot delivered in the arm is not going to be very effective for an infection that takes place in the lungs. The lungs have an immune system in place for tackling infectious respiratory pathogens that contains its own system for producing antibodies. That is why the whole idea of blood levels of antibodies to fight something in the lungs really makes no sense - but that is what we have been sold.
If you are high risk, the most important thing is prophylactic protocols. Protect yourself as much as you can. Get your Vitamin D levels up to at least 70-80ng/ml. Those levels can also plummet if you get sick - so increase to 50K IU for at least 3 days to a week. High doses of Vitamin C - at least a couple thousand mgs a day. Of course zinc - but zinc should be balanced with copper so as to not deplete copper if zinc is going to be taken over a longer term. I am not a believer in long term higher dose zinc for several months. This is just my opinion, but 15-20mg/day of zinc/copper is fine as a preventative dosage. When sick, increase to 50mg/day in divided doses until well, then decrease. If there are sufficient zinc ionophores onboard, such as HCQ, Ivermectin, or quercetin, less zinc is needed as prevention since the ionophore drives the zinc into the cell - therefore, less is required. The combination of the zinc and quercetin has been shown to be very effective not only for treatment, but also prevention. NAC will help with free radical damage in lung tissue. Cordyceps is helpful for lungs and kidneys - in fact very few things are helpful for kidneys, but cordyceps is one of them. There are a number of herbal and vitamin supplements that are useful for overall health. Trying to constantly target shoot disease with either drugs or supplements is really the wrong approach. Achieving overall health is far better at improving one's chances than treatment alone. Also, sugar is a killer. The less of it in the diet in all forms, the better.
When someone gets sick, then early treatment must be started ASAP. I have had this bug and it was no fun. It was still a flu, and no flu is a good time. It can make you sick for several days. Have meds on hand like antihistamines and antibiotics so if you need them, you can have access. It is not the virus that is killing people. It is the hospital protocols, secondary infections, and the cytokine storm that does the damage. Receiving monoclonal antibody therapy would still be helpful as part of a multipronged approach to keep from being hospitalized and surviving even though it will be limited. It is a quick jump start for the immune system so that other things have time to work and do their jobs. I hope this helps. Good luck.
Thank you SO MUCH for taking the time to explain all that so thoroughly!! I learn more from people like you than I will ever get from my doctors! I am grateful that you are here for all of us to learn from. Most Sincerely.
You are most welcome fren. We each have an expertise in some area that we can share with others. Medicine and research is my wheelhouse so that is what I share. I like forums like this one that are a clearinghouse for information that we so desperately need right now. So many frens with so much knowledge about so many different topics. It's great. God bless.
You seem very knowledgeable about all this. Although these new pills are perhaps meant to keep people from using Ivermectin, or are at least suppose to be an alternative to it, I am glad to have my tested but off-label Ivermectin. Part of my 'treatment plan' also included the antibody infusion which they are also saying now does now work for the 'new' variant and so they are not using two of the kinds that were available and claiming there is a shortage of the third type of antibody that supposedly does work on the new variant. Is this a ploy to take away a working, albeit EUA drug treatment in order to try and force the vax? Losing this as part of my 'treatment plan' has me distressed, as I am at very high risk. OR, as a EUA infusion treatment, perhaps it wasn't a good part of my plan? Any thoughts? TY
The jabs. as well as the monoclonal antibody therapy, were developed based upon the original genetic sequencing of the alpha and beta strains that came from computer modeling. RNA viruses like SARS and Influenza mutate very quickly. This is why vaxxines and the like are limited in their usefulness over time. Therefore, there is no way to vaxxinate a way out of the cycle of infection for these types of respiratory illnesses. Frankly, much of what we are seeing that is labeled as a variant in reality is partially a coverup for vaxxine injury and ADE infections.
Like Influenza shots, the effectiveness against whatever the declared flavors of the year are that are decided several years in advance, are almost useless due to constant antigenic drift that creates new variants. In addition, a shot delivered in the arm is not going to be very effective for an infection that takes place in the lungs. The lungs have an immune system in place for tackling infectious respiratory pathogens that contains its own system for producing antibodies. That is why the whole idea of blood levels of antibodies to fight something in the lungs really makes no sense - but that is what we have been sold.
If you are high risk, the most important thing is prophylactic protocols. Protect yourself as much as you can. Get your Vitamin D levels up to at least 70-80ng/ml. Those levels can also plummet if you get sick - so increase to 50K IU for at least 3 days to a week. High doses of Vitamin C - at least a couple thousand mgs a day. Of course zinc - but zinc should be balanced with copper so as to not deplete copper if zinc is going to be taken over a longer term. I am not a believer in long term higher dose zinc for several months. This is just my opinion, but 15-20mg/day of zinc/copper is fine as a preventative dosage. When sick, increase to 50mg/day in divided doses until well, then decrease. If there are sufficient zinc ionophores onboard, such as HCQ, Ivermectin, or quercetin, less zinc is needed as prevention since the ionophore drives the zinc into the cell - therefore, less is required. The combination of the zinc and quercetin has been shown to be very effective not only for treatment, but also prevention. NAC will help with free radical damage in lung tissue. Cordyceps is helpful for lungs and kidneys - in fact very few things are helpful for kidneys, but cordyceps is one of them. There are a number of herbal and vitamin supplements that are useful for overall health. Trying to constantly target shoot disease with either drugs or supplements is really the wrong approach. Achieving overall health is far better at improving one's chances than treatment alone. Also, sugar is a killer. The less of it in the diet in all forms, the better.
When someone gets sick, then early treatment must be started ASAP. I have had this bug and it was no fun. It was still a flu, and no flu is a good time. It can make you sick for several days. Have meds on hand like antihistamines and antibiotics so if you need them, you can have access. It is not the virus that is killing people. It is the hospital protocols, secondary infections, and the cytokine storm that does the damage. Receiving monoclonal antibody therapy would still be helpful as part of a multipronged approach to keep from being hospitalized and surviving even though it will be limited. It is a quick jump start for the immune system so that other things have time to work and do their jobs. I hope this helps. Good luck.
Thank you SO MUCH for taking the time to explain all that so thoroughly!! I learn more from people like you than I will ever get from my doctors! I am grateful that you are here for all of us to learn from. Most Sincerely.
You are most welcome fren. We each have an expertise in some area that we can share with others. Medicine and research is my wheelhouse so that is what I share. I like forums like this one that are a clearinghouse for information that we so desperately need right now. So many frens with so much knowledge about so many different topics. It's great. God bless.
God less you too and Merry Christmas.