They are talking about the @ symbol, drawing it in the air, DESCRIBING what they are drawing, and you say they are drawing Qs in the air. This is a waste of everyone's time, and perfect example of the lazy conspiratorial drivel that discredits our entire movement.
I agree it’s cryptic, I just felt like being harsh. However I think his message has more to do with “internet” at its core meaning, as what it was in the beginning when it was birthed. “A network of computers”, like you hear in the video.
It’s just not likely they’re drawing Qs nor that this comm has to do with a Q symbol at all.
Now why would Dan point our attention to the primitive understanding of the internet?
They are talking about the @ symbol, drawing it in the air, DESCRIBING what they are drawing, and you say they are drawing Qs in the air. This is a waste of everyone's time, and perfect example of the lazy conspiratorial drivel that discredits our entire movement.
This was obviously a cryptic post from Scavino. Why would he post this?
I agree it’s cryptic, I just felt like being harsh. However I think his message has more to do with “internet” at its core meaning, as what it was in the beginning when it was birthed. “A network of computers”, like you hear in the video.
It’s just not likely they’re drawing Qs nor that this comm has to do with a Q symbol at all.
Now why would Dan point our attention to the primitive understanding of the internet?